Sniper_ The True Story Of Anti-Abortion Killer James Kopp Part 13

"Life in prison would be difficult, certainly-it always is," Joseph Marusak said, his blue eyes staring unblinkingly into those of the jurors. "But he'll still be able to get up every day. He'll be able to breathe every day. What about his victim?" It was a Thursday in October 1998. The 20-year-old man charged with murder watched the prosecutor work the jury, trying to convince them that the accused deserved to be strapped to a gurney and have pota.s.sium chloride pumped through his veins, stopping his heart-that he, Jonathan Parker, deserved to die. Parker was Joe Marusak's first death penalty case. He had, weeks before, managed to get Parker convicted for murder. Now he was going for the ultimate sentence.

At that time, three years after Republican governor George Pataki had brought back capital punishment to New York State, only one other person sat on death row. Parker had shot decorated Buffalo police officer Charles (Skip) McDougald, father of four. A controversial case. The selection of an all-white jury for Parker-who was black-had drawn criticism. But then the victim had been black, too. Parker had been arrested a few times prior to the shooting on drug and weapon offenses. Before the jury Parker apologized to McDougald's family. He was sorry, truly sorry, for the tragedy he had caused. But Marusak argued that Parker had forfeited his right to live when he aimed a loaded semiautomatic pistol at the police officer's heart.

"If Officer McDougald had been able to steady his aim and kill the defendant, would that action have been justified?" Marusak asked. "If that action was justified, how can the death sentence not be?"

The presiding judge in the case was Michael L. D'Amico. He watched Marusak pour it on, taking the jurors back to the fatal night, putting them in the slain cop's shoes, recounting the final hours of his life.

"He had no clue as he got out of his car that he had an invisible target on his chest. Then the explosion shreds your heart. You reach for the gun out of instinct, your lungs filling with blood and the life going out of you-can you grasp the brutality of this?"

As Marusak spoke, the cop's widow fled the courtroom in tears. Marusak was Catholic, raised by devout parents, attended ma.s.s regularly. Through most of its history, the Roman Catholic Church had supported the death penalty. But by the end of the 20th century, Pope John Paul II opposed capital punishment as "cruel and unnecessary." U.S. Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia, a Catholic, supported the death penalty. If Marusak felt any personal conflict on the issue, he could not let it affect his work in court. He kept his views to himself. But he also felt that arguing in favor of the death penalty in a court of law did not make him a bad Catholic. He hadn't requested the Parker case. It was a.s.signed to him.

Marusak was 44 years old but looked much younger, had thick dark hair with flecks of gray, the pale blue eyes alert, skin unwrinkled, athletic build. He spoke with the distinctive Western New York accent, so when he said his name it sounded like Maroozyak.

He was in court on Sat.u.r.day, October 24, 1998, as the jury returned to render its decision on the sentence for Parker. They deliberated 17 hours over three days. There was one woman on the jury who had refused to be swayed. Parker would live, serve life in prison with no parole. Joe Marusak lost. Marusak kicked himself over it. He should never have accepted that woman on the jury. During jury selection, she had opined that she supported the death penalty only in very rare circ.u.mstances. Marusak had thought he could prove to her that the murder of Skip McDougald was one of those times. He had been wrong.

As if by way of a rematch, faces from that courtroom would meet again. It was the evening before the verdict, on October 23, when another verdict had been rendered in the woods outside Bart Slepian's home-when the sniper had condemned Slepian with a high-powered rifle. The judge in the Jonathan Parker case, Michael D'Amico, would oversee the case that sp.a.w.ned from that night. And Parker's lawyer, John Elmore, would join the legal [image]Prosecutor Joe Marusak defense team for James Charles Kopp. His opposite number would again be Joe Marusak.

When Lynne Slepian heard that Marusak was appointed to prosecute Kopp, she spoke to Glenn Murray, Bart's former lawyer and friend. "The prosecutor's name is Joe Marusak," she told him. "Is he good?"

Murray smiled to himself. How many times had Joe kicked his a.s.s in court? Every time? Yes, every time. "Lynne, this guy works 20 hours a day. He is every defense lawyer's nightmare. He's the best there is."

Chapter 22 ~ The Usual Suspects.

Buffalo, N.Y.

Thursday, August 29, 2002 In order to establish the ident.i.ty of Bart Slepian's killer for the jury, Joe Marusak returned to witnesses who saw the suspicious jogger near Bart's home in the days leading up to the murder four years earlier. He needed them to ID Kopp in a police lineup. Five men filed into the room on the third floor of the police station. They were fillers, all of similar age, weight, height and skin tone to Kopp. A theatrical-makeup artist added a beard and mustache to each, to resemble his appearance in October 1998. A hairstylist added Kopp's coloring, although two of the fillers were close enough that they didn't need it. Kopp was brought in to a different room and, under the eye of Paul Cambria, also made to look as he had back then-now clean-shaven, he was given a fake beard.

In the viewing room, the witnesses were instructed to say nothing to each other. They sat in the first two rows in a.s.signed seats and were handed identification sheets to write on. There would be two lineups. Each man would wear gla.s.ses for the first one, and take them off for the second. Cambria was told that he could place the defendant in any of the numbered spots he wished, but he declined the offer. The lineup entered the viewing room. None of the men were permitted to make any gestures or speak. Each man stepped forward separately, made four quarter turns, then returned to his spot. For the second lineup, each man walked a different route towards a designated spot five feet from the one-way gla.s.s through which the witnesses were watching.

Detective Daniel Rich from the Erie County DA's office spoke to the witnesses. "If you recognize anybody on the stage that was involved in the incident for which you are viewing the lineup, please record the number that he has on his chest. If you don't recognize anybody on the stage, leave it blank."

One of the witnesses was Dolah Barrett. She held a master's degree in sociology and special education. She had seen the plodding jogger back then. Never seen him before in the five years she walked that route. She looked at the men in the lineup and wrote down a number. Jim Kopp's number. A high school social studies teacher named Daniel Lenard was another. He identified Kopp as well. So did Mary Jo Brummer. Landscaper Kenneth Dewey stared at the faces. One of them looked familiar, but he was not sure. Hadn't the jogger seemed taller? He left his sheet blank.

Marusak obtained a court order for Kopp to provide blood and hair samples, as well as handwriting samples to see if it matched the writing found on the SKS rifle purchase application doc.u.ment retrieved from the p.a.w.nshop in Old Hickory, Tennessee. FBI forensic chemist Julie Kidd constructed DNA profiles from hair and skin traces found on the green baseball cap and binoculars left at the shooting scene, and on the toothbrush recovered from Jim Gannon's attic. She compared the DNA from the evidence to that in Kopp's sample. The profiles matched. The odds were at least 1 in 280 billion that the DNA recovered at the crime scene belonged to someone other than the accused.

Among other evidence Marusak gathered for presenting in court were eight exhibits in a file labeled "FBI photos from Canadian investigation." He also had two dozen rolls of film doc.u.menting anti-abortion protests in the Philippines, where Kopp had been, and multiple rolls of film from the FBI's search of a home on Buck Hollow Road in Vermont, where he had lived for a time and where the FBI had seized a Smith & Wesson handgun, two empty bullet clips and two boxes of cartridges.

Marusak and Cambria shared information, as they were required to do. And evidence started leaking to the media. Cambria spoke to reporters and confirmed the rumor that the prosecution had testimony from an unidentified woman-who was in fact Jennifer Rock. "We have been told by the prosecution that one of my client's friends supposedly drove him to Mexico after the homicide," Cambria said. "That's all they've told us. We don't even have the name of the witness who supposedly said this."

Marusak felt confident. He imagined Kopp standing there in the police lineup, seeing the beards on the other guys, knowing the witnesses had to be picking him out. The DNA evidence, the handwriting, the knowledge that Jennifer Rock would testify against him: Kopp could see it coming, this avalanche of evidence. He's got to be feeling the pressure now, thought Marusak, sensing this wave building against him.

As the summer wore on, Marusak worked the case every night, every weekend. It had to be that way, it was the way he approached cases, they became part of him. He needed to be at the top of his game. He forced himself to eat often to keep his energy level high. There was so much evidence against Kopp, but there were also the conspiracy theories. The defense would surely milk them, sow doubt in the minds of jurors. He had to bring them up, counterpunch. Marusak had no wife, or kids. He had never married. You throw yourself into cases like he did, you don't meet many women. He did not necessarily embrace his fate on that score, but he accepted it. His usually rigorous exercise regimen went out the window. He added 16 pounds to his five-foot-eight frame, pus.h.i.+ng him over the 140-pound mark, still trim by most standards, but not what he demanded of himself.

He met with Lynne Slepian several times. He was impressed by her will, her strength, as they went over evidence, photos, details. She always had a pot of coffee, food ready for him.

This widow and mother had a black hole in her life, and yet, on the outside, she wore a stolid mask as she tried to keep a sense of normality in her sons' lives. What Lynne Slepian's boys must have gone through-and continued to go through-having seen their father bleed to death on the kitchen floor. Joe Marusak's father had died young, of a heart attack, in 1989. Joe had not been a kid like the Slepian boys. But he too had watched his father die in front of him, on the kitchen floor.

*** Buffalo, N.Y. July 2002 A trial date for Loretta Marra and Dennis Malvasi was set for August, as the couple continued to be held in a Buffalo prison. If they were convicted of obstructing justice they would each face up to ten years in prison and fines of $250,000. They had already spent 15 months in jail. Marra's lawyer, Bruce Barket, continued working to reach a plea bargain with the prosecution. He argued that she should be released because, he argued, she had helped persuade Kopp to give up his fight against extradition from France and return to the United States to stand trial. Federal prosecutor Kathleen Mehltretter argued that Marra should receive no such credit. But then the prosecutor had her own reasons for reaching a plea deal with Marra-Malvasi. She felt a full-blown trial for the couple would mean calling witnesses who might also be called during the Kopp federal trial-which might hurt the case against Kopp.

On August 13, federal judge Richard Arcara postponed Marra and Malvasi's trial to September, giving lawyers from both sides time to work out a deal. The lawyers arrived at one: Marra and Malvasi would plead guilty to obstruction and receive a reduced sentence of 27 to 33 months. In addition, the couple would not be required to testify against Kopp. On August 21, Arcara flatly rejected the agreement. He thought the punishment suggested in the deal was far too light. Several months earlier, he had presided over Marra and Malvasi's preliminary hearing. He had heard evidence of emails between Kopp and Marra, in which Kopp talked about whether he should "return to the field." Arcara felt the emails reflected "conversations about returning to the field of shooting abortion providers." He believed that Marra and Malvasi had committed serious crimes, including perhaps acting as accessories after the fact in the murder of Dr. Slepian. He declared that the couple's case would go to trial, and set a date of September 24.

In September, Marra filed a motion to dismiss the charges against her. It was rejected by the prosecution. On September 23, the day before the Marra-Malvasi trial was to begin, Kathleen Mehltretter decided she would in fact support Marra's request to dismiss the charges-including obstruction of justice, conspiring to obstruct justice, and aiding and abetting the flight of a fugitive- and instead bring a single lesser charge of conspiracy to harbor a fugitive. She asked for a new trial in the Eastern District of New York, in Brooklyn, at the conclusion of Kopp's trial. Marra and Malvasi agreed to the proposal.

Arcara was not amused. The veteran judge was angry at what he called the prosecution's "manipulative tactics" and "blatant judge shopping." But he added that the law presumes the prosecutor is the best judge of whether a pending case should be terminated. He had little choice but to do as Mehltretter asked and dismiss the obstruction charges against Loretta Marra and Dennis Malvasi. They would return to Brooklyn to stand trial.

Buffalo, N.Y. Summer 2002 When it came time to select a judge to hear Jim Kopp's murder case, there were several in the Buffalo area expressing interest. But whoever presided over the trial was walking into a political minefield. The Western District administrative judge, Vincent E. Doyle Jr., had a decision to make. He turned to the judge who had made the least noise about the case.

He phoned Judge Michael L. D'Amico. "There are quite a few who have asked about it," Doyle said. "Which is one of the reasons I don't want to give it to them. Will you do it?"

D'Amico paused.

"Or let me put it this way," Doyle said. "Do you have any issues with doing it?"

D'Amico knew what that meant. Doyle wanted to know if D'Amico had any issue with taking on a case where abortion was front and center. Doyle had already heard from Kopp's lawyer, Paul Cambria. Cambria said he had no intention of making abortion the central issue, but was definitely worried that he might wind up before a judge who was inclined to crucify Kopp for political reasons. Doyle had asked both Cambria and prosecutor Joe Marusak to submit names of judges they thought would be best suited for the trial. D'Amico thought the exercise was asinine. But his name was on both lists.

D'Amico was 56 years old, from the Buffalo area, married with two kids. He had a casual courtroom manner but he did not suffer fools gladly. He had a modest office with dark wooden interior, deep maroon leather chairs, American flag behind his desk. Through the connecting door was courtroom Number One, where the a.s.sa.s.sin of President William McKinley had been convicted in 1901. Historians said that trial "involved themes that would resonate far into the brand-new century: a dangerously unstable individual on the fringe of society ... the obligation of the bar to defend the indefensible, and a media circus surrounding the public trial."

D'Amico had never taken a public stance on abortion. Judges seeking election in New York State cannot discuss, or campaign on, their position on abortion or other issues such as the death penalty. In New York State, cases involving the death penalty are a.s.signed to specially trained judges whose names go into a rotation. But there is no such system in place when the trial involves other controversial issues such as abortion. D'Amico's silence made him Doyle's choice for the job.

"In the event I a.s.sign it to you," Doyle asked him, "will you take it?"

"Not if you can find someone else who wants it," D'Amico said. "If you can, go with them, it doesn't matter to me. But if you need me, I'll do it."

Buffalo, N.Y. October 2002 In October, Jim Kopp shocked everyone involved in his case when he declared he wanted to replace Paul Cambria with Bruce Barket, Loretta Marra's pro-life lawyer. Judge D'Amico considered the request. Kopp was taking a huge risk. In court, the judge warned him of the potential problems, including a possible conflict of interest for Barket to represent both parties. Kopp replied that he was aware of the issues and was not concerned. Joe Marusak stood and added that Marra could benefit from Kopp making incriminating statements about himself, which could in theory be encouraged by Barket. It angered Kopp to hear Marusak go on like this.

"I'm not comfortable with Mr. Marusak discussing strategy," he said to the judge. On October 22, D'Amico allowed Kopp to switch lawyers. Speculation in the media was that Cambria wanted out anyway, that he did not want the trial to turn into a forum on abortion, as Kopp appeared to desire. And money was drying up for Kopp's defense. Cambria told court that his firm received money from someone who said there were many people donating to the cause of his defense.

"The funds that were paid to our firm have long been exhausted," Cambria said. "And in any event, the funds were not donated to Mr. Kopp personally. As a result there are no funds currently held by us for his benefit. Indeed, I arranged for Mr. Kopp's state defense expenses to be paid by the county of Erie due to his indigent state."

In Barket Kopp now had a lawyer ready to argue the case the way he wanted. "Whether people want to hear it or not, this case is all about abortion," Barket told reporters. "I'm absolutely pro-life and abortion is an abomination and a scourge on society. It's a sign of a twisted society that our government wants to put a man like Jim in prison while allowing more than a million babies each year to be killed by abortions."

Marusak countered that he would focus on the facts proving the murder of Dr. Barnett Slepian by James Kopp was planned and deliberate. The sniper's motivation was a moot point. Marusak had kept himself ready for whatever curves were thrown at him. But even he couldn't antic.i.p.ate the twists to come.

*** Erie County Holding Center Tuesday, November 12, 2002 Jim Kopp loved intrigue, misdirection, unpredictability; it informed his world view and the way he conducted himself, even among close friends. A movie buff, he loved cla.s.sic whodunits like The Maltese Falcon. He loved The Usual Suspects, in which Kevin s.p.a.cey is the seemingly pathetic small-time crook who turns out to be a criminal mastermind hoodwinking police. In the final scene s.p.a.cey's character, a supposedly pathetic man known as "the cripple," is released from custody; seconds later, the star detective realizes he has let the real villain go, and s.p.a.cey has already turned the corner and disappeared. Fooled them all.

In prison Jim came to a decision. He was about to surprise them all again. Through Bruce Barket he arranged a meeting with two veteran reporters from the Buffalo News named Dan Herbeck and Lou Michel. He had never before spoken to journalists. He wanted to tell them something. Kopp, Barket and the reporters sat down in a room in the Erie County Holding Center. Jim Kopp calmly announced that, before he would take any questions, he wanted to make an official statement.

"To pick up a gun and aim it at another human being, and to fire, it's not a human thing to do," he said. "It's not nice. It's gory, it's b.l.o.o.d.y. It overcomes every human instinct. The only thing that would be worse, to me, would be to do nothing, and to allow abortions to continue."

Then he did the unthinkable. He confessed to shooting Dr. Barnett Slepian.

"I did it and I'm admitting it," he said. He described a version of events that became his new defense, and sparked a whole new controversy. He claimed he had been shooting to wound. "I never, ever intended for Dr. Slepian to die. The truth is not that I regret shooting him. I regret that he died. I aimed at his shoulder. The bullet took a crazy ricochet, and that's what killed him. One of my goals was to keep Dr. Slepian alive, and I failed at that goal."

He laid it out. Planned the shooting for more than a year, scouted locations, planned escape routes. Scouted six Buffalo-area abortion providers. Slepian's house was ideal because it backed onto a wooded area. He had been in position, ready to shoot, on two earlier occasions but was not able to lock down on the target.

He described that night. He was in the woods watching the house, waiting for Slepian to appear. He showed in the kitchen, put something in the microwave oven, left the room. He took aim at the spot where he antic.i.p.ated the doctor's left shoulder would be when he came back. Although he was an "expert shot" the shooting had gone wrong. He fired only once because he saw Slepian fall. It saddened Kopp to learn he had died.

The reporters asked more questions. Barket encouraged Kopp to answer most of them, but on occasion cautioned him not to say anything. He wouldn't talk about whether anyone had a.s.sisted him in any way. Would not explain why he buried the rifle and other evidence in the woods. And why had he done it at all? Kopp answered that one.

"Why do you think I used force against Dr. Slepian when he was within ten hours of taking the lives of 25 babies? The question answers itself." The misconception people have about him, he said, was that he is a "peaceful man who would not harm anybody."

They asked him how he felt about the comparison between his actions and those of the sniper who was terrorizing the Was.h.i.+ngton, D.C., area. The question angered him.

"Any reasonable person could see a distinction between me and the D.C. sniper. Why was Dr. Slepian shot? The obvious answer is to save children. If you did the same thing to protect a baby that was one day old, it would never be considered a crime."

And what would Kopp do if he were acquitted and returned to the street?

"I would do something."

Herbeck's and Michel's story was splashed across the front page of the Buffalo News. The morning it ran, Joe Marusak was alone at home, listening to the early news on the radio. The lead story was that James Charles Kopp had confessed. Marusak couldn't believe what he was hearing. He had an inkling that Kopp wanted to make some kind of statement before the trial began. But he didn't know what Kopp might say, or who he would say it to. He was shocked that he'd give an interview to reporters at this stage, period-and confess to boot. It was bizarre. Never seen anything like it. The case had completely changed, but Joe Marusak stayed focused, his mind leaping ahead to the new approach he'd have to take. He had already prepared an argument in case the defense took the position that James Kopp had shot, but not meant to kill, Slepian.

The blue-gray eyes saw the screaming headline in the Buffalo News: "KOPP CONFESSES." Well. To a Catholic, confession means an act of a penitent disclosing his sinfulness before a priest in the hope of absolution. He didn't appreciate the misuse of the word. Confession? Not quite!

His friends and supporters were shocked by the turn of events. Why did Jim Kopp admit to shooting Slepian, and now? He had repeatedly denied that he was guilty. Hadn't he? Perhaps not. When he was in jail in France he told friends he was "innocent" and that he "didn't do it." Did he mean innocent of shooting Slepian, or innocent of killing him? He frequently played with semantics, played with words and their meaning. What was it that he had said to a throng of journalists when he was led from a French court to a waiting police van? "The question you should be asking is, 'Who killed Dr. Slepian?' That's the only question you should be asking." Who killed Dr. Slepian? Had he been telegraphing all along that, despite his denials, he had in fact shot the doctor, but had not meant to kill? Or that G.o.d had taken Bart Slepian's life?

The big question was, "Why?" Why throw himself on his sword like that? Jim Kopp was many things, but unintelligent was not one of them. He knew he stood a shot at acquittal. So why confess? Kopp told the Buffalo News reporters it was because he was haunted by the living victims, Dr. Slepian's wife, her sons, and also that he felt guilt over misleading his supporters all this time. He wanted to finally tell the truth-about what he did, and why he did it. That's what he told the reporters, anyway. Ah, the media. Romanita.

Chapter 23 ~ Biblical Figures.

Brooklyn, N.Y.

November 2002 A week after Jim Kopp's carefully ch.o.r.eographed confession to the Buffalo News, Loretta Marra was escorted out of the Erie County Holding Center in Buffalo, and Dennis Malvasi taken from a federal facility. They were both transported to a prison in Brooklyn for trial. A new bail hearing was scheduled for the following week. Marra had high hopes that she might finally be released. She listened as Bruce Barket made his appeal to Judge Carol Amon for her release. She had been in jail for 19 months. Loretta teared up when Barket mentioned her two young sons.

The case had been a.s.signed to an Eastern District prosecutor, but Western District prosecutor Kathleen Mehltretter appeared in court as well, at the request of the judge, to answer questions, given her background in the case.

"In your opinion," Amon asked, "do Mr. Malvasi and Ms.

Marra pose a flight risk?"

"I believe they do, Your Honor," replied Mehltretter. Anger surged through Loretta Marra when she heard Mehltretter speak. Loretta had been denied bail previously, wasn't this latest denial expected? It was as though this time, she truly expected something different. Something had gone wrong. The judge agreed with Mehltretter. No bail. Marra snapped.

"You lying b.i.t.c.h," she said.

Buffalo, N.Y.

Monday, March 3, 2003 People from all walks of life filed into the courtroom for jury selection in the trial of James Charles Kopp. The accused stood and smiled at the people who would decide his fate. In the wake of Kopp's confession, District Attorney Frank Clark, Joe Marusak's boss, said the strategy had not changed. It just meant there were fewer facts in dispute. They no longer had to prove Kopp pulled the trigger. They just needed to prove that he intended to kill in order to get a murder conviction.

Kopp was an admitted sniper, and that fact drew an even more radical stripe of supporter to attend the trial-those who felt that shooting Bart Slepian was justified. On the sidewalk outside the courthouse, four pro-life demonstrators handed out flyers. The flyers called for the jury to acquit "baby defender James Kopp." One man spoke to reporters and said it was a case of justifiable homicide.

Nearly 200 potential jurors went through orientation and Nearly 200 potential jurors went through orientation and page questionnaire asked whether close friends or relatives had ever belonged to any group that advocated a certain viewpoint on abortion, and whether they had read the Buffalo News story in which Kopp admitted shooting Slepian. Judge Michael D'Amico cautioned them to be honest about their opinions. "The issue of abortion may be raised during the course of this trial ... Whatever your view may be, it does not disqualify you from serving on this jury," he told them.

Jim Kopp watched the jury selection proceed, the faces of strangers pa.s.s before him. What was it his dad used to say? "Juries don't care what you know, but what you can prove."

The next day, March 4, Kopp again turned the trial upside down. He decided to reject trial by jury, he wanted his fate decided by judge alone. And there would be no testimony, no cross.e.xaminations. Instead it would be a "stipulated fact" trial. Counsel on both sides would still have an opportunity to present their arguments in court, but the essential facts of the case would not be at issue at trial. Instead the judge would be given a list of critical facts agreed upon on in advance by the defense and prosecution. Wasn't Kopp's best strategy calling all of the government's evidence into question, debating the details in court, chipping away at the prosecution? Kopp had caught everyone by surprise once more. My G.o.d, thought D'Amico. Does Kopp have any idea what he's doing? Joe Marusak was shocked as well. He had never seen such a maneuver at this stage of a murder trial. What was Kopp thinking? Jim Kopp, the lawyer's son. Courtroom strategist. He had, years before, expressed his view on stipulated-fact trials. In the "Rescuer's Handbook" he had written about them as an "underrated" strategy. "But don't use a stipulated trial," he had cautioned, "unless you are pretty sure they have you dead to rights."

Judges have a responsibility to ensure that any accused person receives an effective defense, particularly in a case as serious as murder. D'Amico knew that Kopp's best defense rested with a jury trial. So the judge told him, repeatedly, that he should go with a jury.

"Do not presume anything about me, Mr. Kopp," he warned. "If you want my personal opinion, go with a jury. But it's your call. You have an absolute right to waive a jury. I can't stop you." There were numerous reasons to stick with a jury trial, D'Amico said. There were no guarantees either way, but with a jury, if he could just convince one of the 12 jurors that he was shooting to wound, Kopp could get a hung jury. D'Amico even a.s.signed an independent counsel to talk to Kopp about the decision. The appointed lawyer met with Kopp for six hours. He returned to D'Amico and said the accused was fully aware of his rights, but this is the way he wants to proceed, he was not budging. Bruce Barket, for his part, told Court TV that he was "comfortable" with Jim's new strategy. "Reasonable people can differ," he said. "Jim gets to make the call. I'm along for the ride."

Why did Kopp waive a jury? Privately, D'Amico had his own theories. A stipulated-fact bench trial meant the case would be brief. The judge had already ruled that TV cameras would not be permitted in the courtroom. That meant Kopp would not have a soapbox to talk about abortion. So why bother with a drawn-out jury trial? Or maybe that wasn't it, maybe Kopp decided that a long trial would mean the prosecution could trot out witness after witness, friends of his-maybe Loretta. He didn't want them exposed that way. Or, thought the judge, it might be as simple as money saved by a short trial. Barket would incur expenses traveling back and forth to his [image]Kopp is led into Courtroom No. 1.

home on Long Island. Whatever donations Kopp had received had dried up, especially since his confession. D'Amico had no choice but to grant Kopp's wish. In all, 400 jurors had filled out the 16-page questionnaire, but none would hear the case.

Erie County Hall Buffalo, N.Y.

Monday, March 17, 2003 James Charles Kopp entered Courtroom Number One handcuffed, wearing tan pants and navy blazer with a bulletproof vest underneath. He wore square wire-rimmed gla.s.ses, his rust-brown hair brushed to one side. Visually he remained a paradox, a man accused of cold-blooded murder who looked meek and even frail. One woman in the gallery thought he looked handsome, maybe even strikingly so, with his full lips. Another thought he looked like a geek at best, downright ugly at worst, with a "gaping fish mouth." Seeing him in person for the first time left people with a vague sense of unease. There was just something about him.

[image]Judge Michael D'Amico He wasn't the kind of figure most people a.s.sociated with the FBI's Ten Most Wanted List. He was no Timothy McVeigh, with the square Marine jaw, brush cut, menacing stare. Handcuffs? They looked ridiculous on Kopp. This, wrote one reporter, is Atomic Dog? This is the sniper who evaded the FBI, Interpol, and the RCMP for 28 months?

When they weren't on Kopp, all eyes in court were on Bart Slepian's widow, Lynne, who sat quietly, surrounded by family and friends, wearing a black suit, her blond hair pulled into a ponytail. Support from friends was so strong there seemed to be a force s.h.i.+eld around her, one that kept even the most aggressive reporters from trying to talk to her. When Kopp entered the courtroom he avoided her stare. But he paused to nod and smile at pro-life radical Michael Bray in the crowd. Kopp seemed to have little chance of acquittal, given the admitted, d.a.m.ning facts, and no jury to ma.s.sage. All the defense had to work with was Kopp's intent.

Judge D'Amico took his seat.

"Your Honor," began Joe Marusak, "the first matter this morning is People of the State of New York against James Charles Kopp, under indictment 98-2555-S01."

D'Amico asked Kopp questions to ensure, for the record, that he still wanted to proceed the way he had requested-a stipulatedfact trial, and by judge alone-and that Kopp consented to the facts that Marusak was about to present. "And before I approve this stipulation and your desire to proceed in this fas.h.i.+on, Mr. Kopp," said D'Amico, "let me just ask you a couple of basic questions. You are healthy today, physically and mentally, no problems, no drugs, alcohol or anything like that?"

"No, Your Honor."

"You have a degree, a college degree?"

"Yes, sir."

"In what?"

"Biology."

"That's a bachelor's degree?"