A Report On Washington Territory Part 11

An additional difficulty was that the mine had taken fire.

[Sidenote: Cost of mining.]

The cost of mining at Newcastle has ranged from 85 cents to $1.50 per ton, averaging about $1.10.

[Sidenote: Large production.]

According to Governor Squire, in 1884, the beds mined at Newcastle were, beginning at the lowest, 14 feet, 10 feet, and 5 feet in thickness. The dip is 30 to 40 northward, and the trend north 80 west. Governor Semple gives the following as the output of the Newcastle mines from June 30, 1878, to June 30, 1887:

1879 127,381 1880 128,853 1881 149,602 1882 158,340 1883 218,742 1884 149,948 1885 149,050 1886 85,561 1887 140,701 --------- Total 1,308,178

Average per year 145,353

"The great falling off in the output for 1886 is attributable mainly to the labor troubles of that year, the mine being closed for several months; also the abandonment of the workings from the No. 4 vein."

The slope has now been sunk to a depth of 950 feet, and the mine is being operated entirely from this level. When this lift is finished, it is thought that several others of equal depth can be sunk as the basin is likely to be very deep.

[Sidenote: Misrepresentation.]

After writing the foregoing, I received a volume issued annually by the United States Geological Survey on the Mineral Resources of the United States for 1886; and on page 364 I read with surprise the following statements in regard to the Newcastle mines of Was.h.i.+ngton Territory: "Considerable iron pyrites is present in this coal, which fact, added to the chaff-like character of the coal for igniting, causes much annoyance and cost to the mine from fires. Coal, or the mine refuse, piled in large quant.i.ties quickly ignites."

I knew when I was in the Territory that the mine was on fire, as I have heretofore stated; but I heard no intimation of spontaneous combustion.

In fact, I was told that it was accidental.

I wrote at once to Mr. David T. Day, of the Government Survey, who is the present editor of this valuable work, asking his authority for such statements concerning this mine as had never, so far as I knew, been made before; though the mines have been described, or mentioned, in all the preceding volumes of the same work, and were mentioned with approval by Bailey Willis, Goodyear, and all other writers on the resources of Was.h.i.+ngton Territory. Moreover, that I had spent weeks in the neighborhood of the mines, and never heard anything of iron pyrites or spontaneous combustion.

Mr. Day replied that he had no personal knowledge on the subject; but that those statements had been furnished him by Mr. James F. Jones, who is connected with some mining operations along the Northern Pacific Railway.

I wrote also to Mr. F. H. Whitworth, of Seattle, calling his attention to the above statements, and asking what was the truth of the matter. I received his reply just in time to insert in this Report. I copy below all that he says on the subject, which puts a different face on the matter.

[Sidenote: Correction by Mr. Whitworth.]

"No, I do not think there is any of any consequence of iron pyrite in the Newcastle mines. Nor do I consider that the fires in the mine originated in the decomposition of the pyrites. The fire in the mine originally started in the 'gob,' close to the furnace used for ventilation, and where the ashes of the furnace were thrown.

Therefore, I have always believed that the fire was not spontaneous in its origin. The fire originated in the upper water level 'lift.'

But it was led down into the second and third 'lifts' by carelessly breaking through the chain pillar, and thus letting the fire down.

Several years before the fire started in the mine, and about three-quarters of a mile, or a mile, west of the point where it started, by careless mining and drawing of pillars, there was a 'squeeze,' and the mine heated; the result, I think, of the crush; but the mine did not fire. While you were out here the mines were in danger of firing, and when the cause was not the proximity of the present fire--but that, too, I think, was brought on by reckless mining. Running their 'b.r.e.a.s.t.s' 75 feet wide and more, and leaving only skeleton pillars, a 'squeeze,' of course, resulted, and the crus.h.i.+ng produced the heat, and it did finally fire. The crus.h.i.+ng being so great that the top work came down to within five or six inches of the bottom, you see easily producing crus.h.i.+ng sufficient to cause fire.

"But the coal does fire outside spontaneously, or rather the slack does, when it is piled in considerable quant.i.ties, and after a year or more of exposure. The combustion in the slack piles usually commences in the firing of the shaley cap rock, which is thrown in with the slack as the rock disintegrates, or as that process goes on with the 'n.i.g.g.e.r-heads' thrown into the slack pile. And yet I feel satisfied that the slack piles fire when there appears to be almost none of the rock or 'n.i.g.g.e.r-head' in it. Two conditions, I think, are required: first, that the slack particles be small, and second, that large quant.i.ties of water be present. And I have supposed the heat and firing was caused by changing of the conditions; small particles of slack by disintegration to much smaller particles.

"And yet it may be possible that there may be sulphur in the form of pyrite present in sufficient quant.i.ty to do its work. Very semi-occasionally, very seldom, I have seen in the sulphur streaks some slight indications of pyrite; but generally the sulphur streaks, or b.a.l.l.s, seem to be composed almost entirely of sand, with very little sulphur, and some coaly matter.

"The coal never has fired on s.h.i.+pboard.

"I remember that, several years, ago Mr. Howard, of the O. I. Co., had collected and stored in his yard in San Francisco, Cal., in one pile, several thousand tons of Newcastle coal, and was carrying it for some time in stock, and that he complained that his coal was heating, and feared fire. Since then they [have not] stowed in such large piles, nor carried stock so long.

"No, sir; the sulphur that we rooted [out] at Gilman was not in form of pyrite, nor have I seen any so far. I do not fear spontaneous combustion, because in the Newcastle, when it has occurred, it has resulted from carelessness."

This statement from Mr. Whitworth is certainly satisfactory on the main point, namely, that there is nothing in this suggestion which need diminish the reputation of the Newcastle coal as a stocking and s.h.i.+pping coal.

In 1884, Mr. Jones (the same man) made a special report to Governor Squire on the coals of Was.h.i.+ngton Territory, in which he describes the Newcastle coal, speaking of it most highly, and saying nothing of spontaneous combustion. He uses the following language concerning the Newcastle coal: "The coal is taken from three beds, and is commercially known as the 'Seattle lignite,' having a bright l.u.s.tre and good fracture. It is a good and choice fuel for steam generating and for domestic use. The condition of the coal adds much to its value."

[Sidenote: Gilman Mines.]

_d. The Squak Creek, Raging River, and Snoqualmie Group._--These are not all in the same hydrographic basin, but they are considered together because they are the coals which will be reached by the Seattle, Lake Sh.o.r.e and Eastern Railroad. A great outcrop of coal seams occurs in the valley of Squak Creek in the mountain spur which lies between Squak and the Newcastle mines. These seams are now being opened by the Seattle Coal and Iron Company, and are known as "The Gilman Mines."

[Sidenote: Structure of Squak Mountain.]

The geological structure of the Squak Mountain and its coal seams is peculiar. With all their local irregularities, the general trend of the coal-bearing rocks in Was.h.i.+ngton Territory is north and south; so determined by the line of the Cascade Mountains, which is the main axis of elevation, with numerous subordinate and parallel axes. But on Squak Mountain we find the whole group of rocks and coal seams whirled at right angles to the general line. In other words, their general direction is east and west, instead of north and south, and the rocks lie in regular order against their central axis, dipping northward at a high angle, and showing no fault, so far as I know, except, possibly, a vertical fracture somewhere in the mountain, as suggested by a change of 38 in the strike at a point about one mile west of the outcrop on Squak. If the fracture exists, it does not follow that there is any serious dislocation. These coal seams are thus carried almost squarely across the spur from Squak Creek to Coal Creek, or from the Gilman Mines to the Newcastle Mines.

The simple explanation is, that, in the upheaval of the country, the Squak Mountain was made by a cross axis of elevation which runs east and west, or at right angles with the Cascade Mountains. Its metamorphic core shows itself along the crest of the mountain.

[Sidenote: Peculiar advantages for mining possessed by the Gilman Mines.]

The part of the mountain which holds the coal seams is a high spur which puts off at right angles northward from the crest or backbone, and continues to Lake Was.h.i.+ngton, a distance of five miles. At the point where the spur leaves the backbone, it may be 1,000 or 1,200 feet high, and it declines gradually to the lake, and then makes a bluff sh.o.r.e-line. On the east side of the spur on Squak Creek it is steep, whilst on the west side, next Newcastle, it drops off more gradually.

This difference of grade occasions a great difference in the economy of mining on the two sides. On the east, or Squak Creek side, the ends of the seams are boldly presented, showing in diagonal parallel lines extending from the top of the spur to the creek level, an average exposure of, say, 900 feet in elevation. Here the entries are being driven in horizontally near the water level, and the future progress of the mining will be inward and upward instead of downward and sidewise, as at Newcastle. The entries will all be on the horizontal line crossing the seams. The extreme distance, 1,300 feet. The length of the seams on the company's land is about two miles. Depth below water level, indefinite.

No s.h.i.+pments have yet been made from Squak Creek, Raging River, or Snoqualmie Mountain, but active developing work has been in progress since September last at the Gilman Mines (forty miles from Seattle), and s.h.i.+pping will begin shortly. A switch of only 600 yards in length is required from the main line of railway to reach the outcrop of the coal, and there is every natural advantage for mining.

[Sidenote: Seattle Coal and Iron Company.]

[Sidenote: Seven seams.]

[Sidenote: Details.]

The Seattle Coal and Iron Company own this property, which consists of 1,300 acres underlaid by seven coal seams, five of which will be mined ultimately, three in the beginning. I was able to examine three seams which will be mined at first, and give the following details.

Top Seam, No. 4, descending:

Roof, rich Bituminous Black Slate, containing streaks of-- FT. INS.

Coal 2 3 Bone 0 1-1/2 Coal 0 7 Slate, variable 0 0-1/2 Coal 0 11 Clay 0 0-1/2 Coal 2 0 Clay, variable 0 1-3/4 Coal 1 1 Clay, mining 0 3 Coal 1 1 ---------- Total, good 6 ft. 3-1/4 ins.

[Sidenote: Good coal.]

This is a good seam of coal, five feet six inches of which can be depended on for s.h.i.+pping. The coal is dull-black in color, and easily mined. The bottom is soft sandstone. Overlying the roof-slate, is sandstone. The seam here is said to be one foot thicker than it is at Newcastle.

[Sidenote: Another good coal seam.]

Seam No. 2 has been uncovered by the diggings on the railroad, and happens to be at an

[Ill.u.s.tration: COAL-BUNKERS OF THE SEATTLE, LAKE Sh.o.r.e AND EASTERN RAILWAY, ON SEATTLE HARBOR.]

unfortunate place for showing the coal. A stump, partly silicified, with part of its bark lignified, had been taken out of the coal bed, and on each side of it was a tapering band of "n.i.g.g.e.r-head," tapering from eight inches at the stump to nothing at the distance of five feet six inches from the stump. Selecting an average place, I got the following section, descending:

Good roof of Argilaceous Sandstone. FT. INS.

Bone 0 1 Coal 0 6 n.i.g.g.e.r-head, local 0 5 Coal 1 10 Coal, sulphurous 0 3 Coal 1 3 Bone 0 0-1/2 Coal 2 0 Black slate floor. ---------- Total 6 ft. 4-1/2 ins.

Judging from this outcrop, which I suspect does not do full justice to the bed, at least six feet of merchantable lignitic coal may be depended on from this seam.