The Pros and Cons of Vivisection Part 7

1st year, 1895--435.

2nd " 1896--444.

During the next six years there were still hesitations and uncertainties as to the best method to be employed.

The mortality during these six years, 1897-1902--439.

Then the practice was definitely established.

The mortality for the three years, 1903-1905--288.

These figures are so eloquent, so striking, so precise, that it is not possible to misunderstand them. They cannot be ignored; and when once they have been set forth, ignorance is no longer permissible, and it is for that reason we have here given them.

In Berlin and in Vienna, it is the same thing. From 1894 the mortality due to diphtheria has diminished to the extent of 150 per cent.

APPENDIX B

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adams (C.). HUNTER AND THE STAG. _A reply to Prof. Owen._ (8vo, London, 1881.)

Adler (H.). ZUR FRAGE DER V. (_Wien med. Woch._, 1879, 1161, 1211, 1241.)

Anstie (F. E.) THE VIVISECTION CONTROVERSY. (_Pract.i.tioner_, 1874, 38 and 321.)

Apinus (S. J.). DISS. EX JURE NATURAE: AN LICEAT BRUTORUM CORPORA MUTILARE ET SPECIATIM OB ES RECHT SEY Da.s.s MAN DEN HUNDEN DIE OHREN ABSCHNEIDE, VARIIS OBSERVATIONIBUS AUCTA. (Altorphii Noricorum, 1722.)

Basch ZUR V. FRAGE. (_Wien med. Blatter_, 1879, 2, 73.)

Beck (J. M.). THE LEGAL ASPECTS OF VIVISECTION. (_Medical News_, 1890, pp.

280-282.)

Bedtnitz (A.). DIE V. GAUKLER. (Wien, 8vo, 1883.)

Berdoe (E.). THE FUTILITY OF EXPERIMENTS WITH DRUGS ON ANIMALS. (8vo, London, 1889.)

---- THE HEALING ART AND THE CLAIMS OF VIVISECTION. (12mo, London, 1890.) A TRIUMPH OF VIVISECTION. (8vo, London, 1890.)

Bernard (Claude). LES VIVISECTIONS. (_Union medicale_, 1865, 305-310 _et Revue Scientifique_, 1878, 799-802.)

Bigelow (H. R.). THE PRACTICAL UTILITY OF VIVISECTION. (_Maryland Med.

Journ._, 1880, 246-249.)

Bowditch (H. P.). VIVISECTION JUSTIFIABLE. (_Sanitar. New York Journ._, 1896, 229-243.)

Bos (A.). SULLE V. (_Imparziale_, 1874, 225-231.)

Brown (J. M.). VIVISECTION, A REPLY TO DR KEEN. (_J. Am. Med. a.s.s._, 1901, 592.)

Bryan (B.). THE BRITISH VIVISECTOR'S DIRECTORY, A BLACK BOOK FOR THE UNITED KINGDOM. (12mo, London, 1890.)

Burt. THE ETHICS OF EXPERIMENTATION UPON LIVING ANIMALS. (Post-graduate, 1890, 53-55.)

Carpenter (W. B.). THE ETHICS OF VIVISECTION. (_Fortnightly Rev._, 1882, 237-246.)

Cejon (E. de). THE ANTI-VIVISECTIONIST AGITATION. (_Contemporary Rev._, 1883, 498-910.)

Coats. ON LUDWIG AND PASTEUR, AND ON VIVISECTION. (_Glasg. Med. Journ._, 1895, 330-335.)

Cobbe (Fr. P.). ILl.u.s.tRATIONS OF VIVISECTION. (8vo, Philadelphia, 1887.)

Cobbe (Fr.). THE MODERN RACK; PAPERS ON VIVISECTION. (8vo, London, 1889.)

Cobbe (Fr. P.). VIVISECTION; FOUR REPLIES. (_Fortnightly Rev._, 1882, 88-104, and _Contemporary Rev._, 1882, 610-626.)

Coleridge (Lord). THE NINETEENTH CENTURY DEFENDERS OF VIVISECTION.

(_Fortnightly Rev._, 1882, 225-236.)

Dalton. EXPERIMENTATION ON ANIMALS. (12mo, New York, 1875.)

Dalton. MAGENDIE AS A PHYSIOLOGIST. (_Internat. Rev._, 1880, 120-129.)

Dalton (J. C). VIVISECTION: WHAT IT IS AND WHAT IT HAS ACCOMPLISHED.

(_Bull. B. York Acad. med._, 1866, 159-198.)

Darwin (Ch.). VIEWS ON VIVISECTION. (_Pop. Sc. Monthly_, 1881, 424; et Rev.

Scient., 1881 (1), 731.)

Davis (N. B.). THE MORAL ASPECTS OF VIVISECTION. (_North Americ. Rev._, 1885, 203-220.)

Delolm de Lalaubie. VIVISECTION, DISS. IN. (Paris, 1868.)

Deswattines. SUGGESTIF PEt.i.t TABLEAU DE LA CRUELLE ET INUTILe VIVISECTION.

(_Medecin_, 1904, 35.)

Ferguson (Sir W.). OPINIONS OF EMINENT SURGEONS, PHYSIOLOGISTS AND OTHERS, AS TO THE FOLLY AND MISLEADING AND DEMORALISING RESULTS OF VIVISECTION.

(London, 1880.)

Fletcher. A FEW NOTES ON CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, ON THE INADEQUACY OF PENAL LAW. (8vo, London, 1846.)

Foreau de Courmelles. ESSAI DE LIMITATION SCIENTIFIQUE DE LA VIVISECTION.

(_Revue med._, 1902, 481-484.)

Foster (M.). VIVISECTION. (_Pop. Sc. Monthly_, 1873, pp. 672-685.)