Bible Myths and their Parallels in other Religions Part 102

[358:2] See also R. Payne Knight's Wors.h.i.+p of Priapus, and the other works of Dr. Thomas Inman.

CHAPTER x.x.xIV.

THE BIRTH-DAY OF CHRIST JESUS.

Christmas--December the 25th--is a day which has been set apart by the Christian church on which to celebrate the birth of their Lord and Saviour, Christ Jesus, and is considered by the majority of persons to be really the day on which he was born. This is altogether erroneous, as will be seen upon examination of the subject.

There was no uniformity in the period of observing the Nativity among the early Christian churches; some held the festival in the month of May or April, others in January.[359:1]

The _year_ in which he was born is also as uncertain as the month or day. "The year in which it happened," says Mosheim, the ecclesiastical historian, "has not hitherto been fixed with certainty, notwithstanding the deep and laborious researches of the learned."[359:2]

According to IRENaeUS (A. D. 190), on the authority of "The Gospel," and "all the elders who were conversant in Asia with John, the disciple of the Lord," Christ Jesus lived to be nearly, if not quite, _fifty years of age_. If this celebrated Christian father is correct, and who can say he is not, Jesus was born some twenty years before the time which has been a.s.signed as that of his birth.[359:3]

The Rev. Dr. Giles says:

"Concerning the _time_ of Christ's birth there are even greater doubts than about the _place_; for, though the four Evangelists have noticed several contemporary facts, which would seem to settle this point, yet on comparing these dates with the general history of the period, we meet with serious discrepancies, which involve the subject in the greatest uncertainty."[359:4]

Again he says:

"Not only do we date our time from the exact year in which Christ _is said to have been born_, but our ecclesiastical calendar has determined with scrupulous minuteness the day and almost the hour at which every particular of Christ's wonderful life is stated to have happened. All this is implicitly believed by millions; _yet all these things are among the most uncertain and shadowy that history has recorded. We have no clue to either the day or the time of year, or even the year itself, in which Christ was born._"[360:1]

Some Christian writers fix the year 4 B. C., as the time when he was born, others the year 5 B. C., and again others place his time of birth at about 15 B. C. The Rev. Dr. Geikie, speaking of this, in his _Life of Christ_, says:

"The whole subject is _very uncertain_. Ewald appears to fix the date of the birth at _five_ years earlier than our era.

Petavius and Usher fix it on the 25th of December, _five_ years before our era. Bengel on the 25th of December, _four_ years before our era; Anger and Winer, _four_ years before our era, _in the Spring_; Scaliger, _three_ years before our era, in _October_; St. Jerome, _three_ years before our era, on December 25th; Eusebius, _two_ years before our era, on _January_ 6th; and Idler, _seven_ years before our era, in _December_."[360:2]

Albert Barnes writes in a manner which implies that he knew all about the _year_ (although he does not give any authorities), but knew nothing about the _month_. He says:

"The birth of Christ took place _four_ years before the common era. That era began to be used about A. D. 526, being first employed by Dionysius, and is supposed to have been placed about four years too late. Some make the difference two, others three, four, five, and even eight years. He was born at the commencement of the last year of the reign of Herod, or at the close of the year preceding."[360:3]

"The Jews sent out their flocks into the mountainous and desert regions during the summer months, and took them up in the latter part of October or the first of November, when the cold weather commenced. . . . It is clear from this that our Saviour was born before the 25th of December, or before what we call _Christmas_. At that time it is cold, and especially in the high and mountainous regions about Bethlehem. _G.o.d has concealed the time of his birth. There is no way to ascertain it._ By different learned men it has been fixed at each month in the year."[360:4]

Canon Farrar writes with a little more caution, as follows:

"Although the date of Christ's birth cannot be fixed with absolute certainty, there is at least a large amount of evidence to render it _probable_ that he was born _four_ years before our present era. It is universally admitted that our received chronology, which is not older than Dionysius Exiguus, in the sixth century, is wrong. But all attempts to discover the _month_ and the _day_ are useless. No data whatever exists to enable us to determine them with even approximate accuracy."[360:5]

Bunsen attempts to show (on the authority of _Irenaeus_, above quoted), that Jesus was born some _fifteen_ years before the time a.s.signed, and that he lived to be nearly, if not quite, fifty years of age.[361:1]

According to Basnage,[361:2] the Jews placed his birth near a century sooner than the generally a.s.sumed epoch. Others have placed it even in the _third century_ B. C. This belief is founded on a pa.s.sage in the "_Book of Wisdom_,"[361:3] written about 250 B. C., which is supposed to refer to Christ _Jesus_, and none other. In speaking of some individual who lived _at that time_, it says:

"He professeth to have the knowledge of G.o.d, and he calleth himself _the child of the Lord_. He was made to reprove our thoughts. He is grievous unto us even to behold; for his life is not like other men's, his ways are of another fas.h.i.+on. We are esteemed of him as counterfeits; he abstaineth from our ways as from filthiness; he p.r.o.nounceth the end of the just to be blessed, _and maketh his boast that G.o.d is his father_. Let us see if his words be true; and let us prove what shall happen in the end of him. For if the _just man_ be the son of G.o.d, he (G.o.d) will help him, and deliver him from the hand of his enemies. Let us examine him with despitefulness and torture, that we may know his meekness, and prove his patience. Let us condemn him with a shameful death; for by his own saying he shall be respected."

This is a very important pa.s.sage. Of course, the church claim it to be a _prophecy_ of what Christ Jesus was to do and suffer, but this does not explain it.

If the writer of the "_Gospel according to Luke_" is correct, Jesus was not born until about A. D. 10, for he explicitly tells us that this event did not happen until Cyrenius was governor of Syria.[361:4] Now it is well known that Cyrenius was not appointed to this office until long after the death of Herod (during whose reign the Matthew narrator informs us Jesus was born[361:5]), and that the taxing spoken of by the Luke narrator as having taken place at this time, did not take place until about ten years after the time at which, according to the Matthew narrator, Jesus was born.[361:6]

Eusebius, the first ecclesiastical historian,[361:7] places his birth at the time Cyrenius was governor of Syria, and therefore at about A. D.

10. His words are as follows:

"It was the two and fortieth year after the reign of Augustus the Emperor, and the eight and twentieth year after the subduing of Egypt, and the death of Antonius and Cleopatra, when last of all the Ptolemies in Egypt ceased to bear rule, when our Saviour and Lord Jesus Christ, at the time of the first taxing--Cyrenius, then President of Syria--was born in Bethlehem, a city of Judea, according unto the prophecies in that behalf premised."[362:1]

Had the Luke narrator known anything about Jewish history, he never would have made so gross a blunder as to place the taxing of Cyrenius in the days of Herod, and would have saved the immense amount of labor that it has taken in endeavoring to explain away the effects of his ignorance. One explanation of this mistake is, that there were _two_ a.s.sessments, one about the time Jesus was born, and the other ten years after; but this has entirely failed. Dr. Hooykaas, speaking of this, says:

"The Evangelist (Luke) falls into the most extraordinary mistakes throughout. In the first place, history is silent as to a census of the whole (Roman) world ever having been made at all. In the next place, though Quirinius certainly did make such a register in Judea and Samaria, it did not extend to Galilee; so that Joseph's household was not affected by it.

Besides, _it did not take place until ten years after the death of Herod_, when his son Archelaus was deposed by the emperor, and the districts of Judea and Samaria were thrown into a Roman province. Under the reign of Herod, nothing of the kind took place, nor was there any occasion for it.

Finally, at the time of the birth of Jesus, the Governor of Syria was not Quirinius, but Quintus Sentius Saturninus."[362:2]

The inst.i.tution of the festival of the Nativity of Christ Jesus being held on the 25th of December, among the Christians, is attributed to Telesphorus, who flourished during the reign of Antonius Pius (A. D.

138-161), but the first _certain_ traces of it are found about the time of the Emperor Commodus (A. D. 180-192).[362:3]

For a long time the Christians had been trying to discover upon what particular day Jesus had possibly or probably come into the world; and conjectures and traditions that rested upon absolutely no foundation, led one to the 20th of May, another to the 19th or 20th of April, and a third to the 5th of January. At last the opinion of the _community at Rome_ gained the upper hand, and the 25th of December was fixed upon.[362:4] It was not until the _fifth_ century, however, that this day had been _generally_ agreed upon.[362:5] _How it happened_ that this day finally became fixed as the birthday of Christ Jesus, may be inferred from what we shall now see.

On the first moment after midnight of the 24th of December (_i. e._, on the morning of the 25th), nearly all the nations of the earth, as if by common consent, celebrated the accouchement of the "_Queen of Heaven_,"

of the "_Celestial Virgin_" of the sphere, and the birth of the G.o.d _Sol_.

In _India_ this is a period of rejoicing everywhere.[363:1] It is a great religious festival, and the people _decorate their houses with garlands_, and _make presents to friends and relatives_. This custom is of very great antiquity.[363:2]

In _China_, religious solemnities are celebrated at the time of the _winter solstice_, the last week in _December_, when all shops are shut up, and the courts are closed.[363:3]

_Buddha_, the son of the Virgin Maya, on whom, according to Chinese tradition, "the Holy Ghost" had descended, was said to have been born on Christmas day, December 25th.[363:4]

Among the ancient _Persians_ their most splendid ceremonials were in honor of their Lord and Saviour _Mithras_; they kept his birthday, with many rejoicings, on the 25th of December.

The author of the "_Celtic Druids_" says:

"It was the custom of the heathen, long before the birth of Christ, to celebrate the birth-day of their G.o.ds," and that, "the 25th of December was a great festival with the _Persians_, who, in very early times, celebrated the birth of their G.o.d _Mithras_."[363:5]

The Rev. Joseph B. Gross, in his "_Heathen Religion_," also tells us that:

"The ancient Persians celebrated a festival in honor of _Mithras_ on the first day succeeding the _Winter Solstice_, the object of which was to _commemorate the Birth of Mithras_."[363:6]

Among the ancient _Egyptians_, for centuries before the time of Christ Jesus, the 25th of December was set aside as the birthday of their G.o.ds.

M. Le Clerk De Septchenes speaks of it as follows:

"The ancient Egyptians fixed the pregnancy of _Isis_ (the _Queen of Heaven_, and the _Virgin Mother_ of the Saviour Horus), on the last days of March, and towards the end of _December_ they placed the commemoration of her delivery."[363:7]

Mr. Bonwick, in speaking of _Horus_, says:

"He is the great G.o.d-loved of Heaven. His birth was one of the greatest mysteries of the Egyptian religion. Pictures representing it appeared on the walls of temples. One pa.s.sed through the holy _Adytum_[364:1] to the still more sacred quarter of the temple known as the birth-place of Horus. He was presumably the child of Deity. _At Christmas time_, or that answering to our festival, his image was brought out of that sanctuary with peculiar ceremonies, as the image of the infant _Bambino_[364:2] is still brought out and exhibited in Rome."[364:3]

Rigord observes that the Egyptians not only wors.h.i.+ped a _Virgin Mother_ "prior to the birth of our Saviour, but exhibited the effigy of her son lying in the manger, in the manner the infant Jesus was afterwards laid in the cave at Bethlehem."[364:4]

The "Chronicles of Alexandria," an ancient Christian work, says:

"Watch how Egypt has constructed the childbirth of a Virgin, and the birth of her son, _who was exposed in a crib to the adoration of the people_."[364:5]