The Trial of Charles Random de Berenger, Sir Thomas Cochrane Part 52

_Q._ Did you do so that morning?

_A._ I am not quite certain; but I am in the constant habit of receiving notes from them.

_Q._ Do you remember hearing in the course of the morning, of a post chaise coming through the city?

_A._ I did.

_Q._ Did that occasion a still further rise in the funds?

_A._ I do not know.

_Q._ Before business left off, the funds fell again?

_A._ They did.

_Lord Ellenborough._ About what o'clock did the funds fall?

_A._ I believe about two.

_Mr. Gurney._ It was discovered at that time that the good news was not true?

_A._ It certainly was not believed.

_Q._ Have you an account of the different purchases from the 12th to the 21st, taken from your books?

_A._ I have.

_The Witness delivered in the Accounts._

_Mr. Serjeant Best._ From what are those taken?

_A._ From my books.

_Mr. Gurney._ Have you carried those accounts down to the 5th of March?

_A._ I have.

_Q._ Has Mr. Baily, also had access to your books, to take the different balances?

_A._ He has.

_Mr. Gurney._ The reading of this would not be very intelligible, a sight of it perhaps would be the best thing.

_Lord Ellenborough._ We must have the sum total or the results.

_Mr. Gurney._ I will give your Lords.h.i.+p the result after the examination of several stock brokers; Mr. Baily has abstracted the whole.

_Mr. Serjeant Best._ I shall carry back the accounts considerably earlier; that should be understood. If I put in accounts of an earlier date, it must not be considered that I am giving evidence in so doing.

_Mr. Gurney._ I take it the same, as if my learned friend cross examined Mr. Fearn upon that subject.

_Cross-examined by Mr. Serjeant Best_.

_Q._ You have spoken of these gentlemen engaging in stock transactions, you have been carried back no further than February the 8th, they had all three of them bought to an enormous amount long before that time--had they not?

_A._ Certainly.

_Q._ And as to sales, had they not sold very large sums, long antecedent to the month of February?

_A._ Oh yes.

_Q._ Can you state as to my Lord Cochrane, for instance, had he not sold hundreds of thousands before that time?

_A._ Yes.

_Q._ I would ask you, did he not from time to time, down to that time, continue to be selling large sums?

_A._ Yes.

_Q._ With respect to Mr. Cochrane Johnstone--on the 10th or 11th of February, had he not a balance of 100,000.

_Mr. Gurney._ To save my learned friend time, my account shews every day's purchases, and every day's sales from that time.

_Mr. Serjeant Best._ Be so good as to look at that printed paper, and tell me whether that is not a correct statement of Mr. Cochrane Johnstone's account with you.

_A._ I cannot tell from this book.

_Mr. Gurney._ I believe the accounts will agree to a farthing, from the time they each begin.

_Mr. Serjeant Best._ Then the larger sales will appear upon this paper without troubling his Lords.h.i.+p to take them down upon his notes; there were very large sales for all of them several days precedent to the 21st.

_A._ Yes, there were.

_Q._ I believe they began these speculations as early as the month of November, did they not?

_A._ Yes.

_Q._ Mr. b.u.t.t managed princ.i.p.ally--very much for these gentlemen--for Lord Cochrane particularly?

_A._ Yes, he did.

_Q._ Lord Cochrane, you have told us, was not there on the morning of the 21st?

_A._ No, he was not.

_Q._ For a great many days, I believe I may say months, had you not been directed to sell their stock whenever it should so rise, that you could get one per cent?