The Letters of Ambrose Bierce Part 17
You’re reading novel The Letters of Ambrose Bierce Part 17 online at LightNovelFree.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit LightNovelFree.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy!
My favorite translation of Homer is that of Pope, of whom it is the present fas.h.i.+on to speak disparagingly, as it is of Byron. I know all that can be said against them, and say _some_ of it myself, but I wish their detractors had a little of their brains. I know too that Pope's translations of The Iliad and The Odyssey are rather paraphrases than translations. But I love them just the same, while wondering (with you, doubtless) what so profoundly affected Keats when he "heard Chapman speak out loud and bold." Whatever it was, it gave us what Coleridge p.r.o.nounced the best sonnet in our language; and Lang's admiration of Homer has given us at least the next best. Of course there must be something in poems that produce poems--in a poet whom most poets confess their king. I hold (with Poe) that there is no such thing as a _long_ poem--a poem of the length of an Epic. It must consist of poetic pa.s.sages connected by _recitativo_, to use an opera word; but it is perhaps better for that. If the writer cannot write "sustained" poetry the reader probably could not read it. Anyhow, I vote for Homer.
I am pa.s.sing well, but shall soon seek the mountains, though I hope to be here when Scheff points his prow this way. Would that you were sailing with him!
I've been hearing all about all of you, for Eva Crawford has been among you "takin' notes," and Eva's piquant comments on what and whom she sees are delicious reading. I should suppose that _you_ would appreciate Eva--most persons don't. She is the best letter writer of her s.e.x--who are all good letter writers--and she is much beside. I may venture to whisper that you'd find her estimate of your work and personality "not altogether displeasing."
Now that I'm about such matters, I shall enclose a note to my friend Dr. Robertson, who runs an insanery at Livermore and is an interesting fellow with a ditto family and a library that will make you pea-green with envy. Go out and see him some day and take Scheff, or any friend, along--he wants to know you. You won't mind the facts that he thinks all poetry the secretion of a diseased brain, and that the only reason he doesn't think all brains (except his own) diseased is the circ.u.mstance that not all secrete poetry.
Seriously, he is a good fellow and full of various knowledges that most of us wot not of.
Sincerely yours, AMBROSE BIERCE.
[Was.h.i.+ngton, D. C., June 14, 1904.]
MY DEAR GEORGE,
I have a letter from * * *, who is in St. Louis, to which his progress has been more leisurely than I liked, considering that I am remaining away from my mountains only to meet him. However, he intimates an intention to come in a week. I wish you were with him.
I am sending the W. of W. to Scribner's, as you suggest, and if it is not taken shall try the other mags in the order of your preference.
But it's funny that you--_you_--should prefer the "popular" magazines and wish the work "ill.u.s.trated." Be a.s.sured the ill.u.s.trations will shock you if you get them.
I understand what you say about being bored by the persons whom your work in letters brings about your feet. The most _contented_ years of my life lately were the two or three that I pa.s.sed here before Was.h.i.+ngton folk found out that I was an author. The fact has leaked out, and although not a soul of them buys and reads my books some of them bore me insupportably with their ignorant compliments and unwelcome attentions. I fancy I'll have to "move on."
Tell Maid Marian to use gloves when modeling, or the clay will enter into her soul through her fingers and she become herself a Shape of Clay. My notion is that she should work in a paste made of ashes-of-roses moistened with nectar.
Sincerely yours, AMBROSE BIERCE.
P.S. Does it bore you that I like you to know my friends? Professor * * *'s widow (and daughter) are very dear to me. She knows about you, and I've written her that I'd ask you to call on her. You'll like them all right, but I have another purpose. I want to know how they prosper; and they are a little reticent about that. Maybe you could ascertain indirectly by seeing how they live. I asked Grizzly to do this but of course he didn't, the s.h.a.ggy brute that he is.
A. B.
[Haines' Falls, Greene Co., N. Y., August 4, 1904.]
DEAR GEORGE,
I haven't written a letter, except on business, since leaving Was.h.i.+ngton, June 30--no, not since Scheff's arrival there. I now return to earth, and my first call is on you.
You'll be glad to know that I'm having a good time here in the Catskills. I shall not go back so long as I can find an open hotel.
I should like to hear from you about our--or rather your--set in California, and especially about _you_. Do you still dally with the Muse? Enclosed you will find two d.a.m.ning evidences of additional incapacity. _Harper's_ now have "A Wine of Wizardry," and they too will indubitably turn it down. I shall then try _The Atlantic_, where it should have gone in the first place; and I almost expect its acceptance.
I'm not working much--just loafing on my cottage porch; mixing an occasional c.o.c.ktail; infesting the forests, knife in hand, in pursuit of the yellow-birch sapling that furnishes forth the walking stick like yours; and so forth. I knocked off work altogether for a month when Scheff came, and should like to do so for _you_. Are you never going to visit the scenes of your youth?
It is awfully sad--that latest visit of Death to the heart and home of poor Katie Peterson. Will you kindly a.s.sure her of my sympathy?
Love to all the Piedmontese. Sincerely yours,
AMBROSE BIERCE.
[Haines' Falls, Greene Co., N. Y., August 27, 1904.]
MY DEAR GEORGE,
First, thank you for the knife and the distinction of members.h.i.+p in the Ancient and Honorable Order of Knifers. I have made little use of the blades and other appliances, but the corkscrew is in constant use.
I'm enclosing a little missive from the editor of _Harper's_. Please reserve these things awhile and sometime I may ask them of you to "point a moral or adorn a tale" about that poem. If we can't get it published I'd like to write for some friendly periodical a review of an unpublished poem, with copious extracts and a brief history of it.
I think that would be unique.
I find the pictures of Marian interesting, but have the self-denial to keep only one of them--the prettiest one of course. Your own is rather solemn, but it will do for the t.i.tle page of the Testimony, which is still my favorite reading.
Scheff showed me your verses on Katie's baby, and Katie has since sent them. They are very tender and beautiful. I would not willingly spare any of your "personal" poems--least of all, naturally, the one personal to me. Your success with them is exceptional. Yet the habit of writing them is perilous, as the many failures of great poets attest--Milton, for example, in his lines to Syriack Skinner, his lines to a baby that died a-bornin' and so forth. The reason is obvious, and you have yourself, with sure finger, pointed it out:
"Remiss the ministry they bear Who serve her with divided heart; She stands reluctant to impart Her strength to purpose, end, or care."
When one is intent upon pleasing some mortal, one is less intent upon pleasing the immortal Muse. All this is said only by way of admonition for the future, not in criticism of the past. I'm a sinner myself in that way, but then I'm not a saint in any way, so my example doesn't count.
I don't mind * * * calling me a "dignified old gentleman"--indeed, that is what I have long aspired to be, but have succeeded only in the presence of strangers, and not always then. * * *
(I forgot to say that your poem is now in the hands of the editor of the Atlantic.)
Your determination to "boom" me almost frightens me. Great Scott!
you've no notion of the magnitude of the task you undertake; the labors of Hercules were as nothing to it. Seriously, don't make any enemies that way; it is not worth while. And you don't know how comfortable I am in my obscurity. It is like being in "the shadow of a great rock in a weary land."
How goes the no sale of Shapes of Clay? I am slowly saving up a bit of money to recoup your friendly outlay. That's a new thing for me to do--the saving, I mean--and I rather enjoy the sensation. If it results in making a miser of me you will have to answer for it to many a worthy complainant.
Get thee behind me, Satan!--it is not possible for me to go to California yet. For one thing, my health is better here in the East; I have utterly escaped asthma this summer, and summer is my only "sickly season" here. In California I had the thing at any time o' year--even at Wright's. But it is my hope to end my days out there.
I don't think Millard was too hard on Kipling; it was no "unconscious"
plagiarism; just a "straight steal."
About Prentice Mulford. I knew him but slightly and used to make mild fun of him as "Dismal Jimmy." That expressed my notion of his character and work, which was mostly prose plat.i.tudes. I saw him last in London, a member of the Joaquin Miller-Charles Warren Stoddard-Olive Harper outfit at 11 Museum Street, Bloomsbury Square.
He married there a fool girl named Josie--forget her other name--with whom I think he lived awhile in h.e.l.l, then freed himself, and some years afterward returned to this country and was found dead one morning in a boat at Sag Harbor. Peace to the soul of him. No, he was not a faker, but a conscientious fellow who mistook his vocation.
My friends have returned to Was.h.i.+ngton, but I expect to remain here a few weeks yet, infesting the woods, devastating the mountain larders, supervising the sunsets and guiding the stars in their courses. Then to New York, and finally to Was.h.i.+ngton. Please get busy with that fame o' yours so as to have the wealth to come and help me loaf.
The Letters of Ambrose Bierce Part 17
You're reading novel The Letters of Ambrose Bierce Part 17 online at LightNovelFree.com. You can use the follow function to bookmark your favorite novel ( Only for registered users ). If you find any errors ( broken links, can't load photos, etc.. ), Please let us know so we can fix it as soon as possible. And when you start a conversation or debate about a certain topic with other people, please do not offend them just because you don't like their opinions.
The Letters of Ambrose Bierce Part 17 summary
You're reading The Letters of Ambrose Bierce Part 17. This novel has been translated by Updating. Author: Ambrose Bierce already has 620 views.
It's great if you read and follow any novel on our website. We promise you that we'll bring you the latest, hottest novel everyday and FREE.
LightNovelFree.com is a most smartest website for reading novel online, it can automatic resize images to fit your pc screen, even on your mobile. Experience now by using your smartphone and access to LightNovelFree.com