A Fantasy of Far Japan Part 5

Her complexion was snow white, her eyes were dark, as also her hair, which was surmounted by a coronet of pearls, and round her throat was a necklace of the same. She happened to know me already by name, through her relatives whom I met in England. This naturally afforded us a subject of conversation as we proceeded. On arriving at one end of the corridors we stood, still conversing, and looking down into the hall, while the other people moved on the further end of the corridor where many more guests gradually arrived. While thus conversing, a n.o.bleman pa.s.sing us was introduced to me.

--'All the generals are gone to the Front,' he said, rather suddenly.

At first I thought he was referring to the war in the Far East, though I soon realised what he meant. He appeared a little excited.

--'There is more exaggeration than fact,' said I. 'I am quite confident that there will be no rupture.'

At that moment some one persuaded my fair companion to go over to where the prince was sitting. I followed at a distance, and took my seat in an obscure place in the corridor. From the corridor of the other side, an operatic singer, accompanied by a pianist, rendered the choicest of his songs, and the bands played in the intervals.

I listened to the songs and the music and watched the people. Sitting alone I am sure I must have looked awkward and stupid; which, however, is a thing I do not much mind. Now and then the host came and exchanged some words with me. He was busy looking after his guests generally, but managed to tell me he would invite me to a special dinner very soon to which also the d.u.c.h.ess Fairfield would be asked. The hostess was similarly occupied, and I did not converse much with her, except to pa.s.s a few remarks about music. She said she preferred vocal music to instrumental. The music over, all went down to the garden. It was delightful: the open air on a summer's night is always so. Light but choice refreshments were served there. The guests, partaking of them as they wished, chatted here and there in groups of two and three.

The night was far advanced and the guests began to disperse one after another. I also left, but without bidding adieu either to the host or hostess lest I might disturb them. On my way out I saw the lady with whom I had talked in the corridor still sitting on a bench chatting with a few gentlemen. She seemed to notice me, but I merely bowed and pa.s.sed on, though I fancied she had some sympathy for us j.a.panese. She did not, neither does any member of her community, say anything about the hard fate of her race or the countless hards.h.i.+ps which they are suffering, especially of late, in certain quarters of the globe. In this world, we know there are many matters in which silence speaks more than words.

Time and s.p.a.ce, and indeed, sequence of events, are incongruous in Dreamland. One flits from place to place. I now found myself in a large mansion. It was the residence of the Marchioness Vivastine. I was of the few early arrivals. The salon was rather dark, but cool and s.p.a.cious.

The marchioness was not yet down, but the valet told me she would soon appear. In a minute or two she entered accompanied by her sister, asking as they greeted us our pardon for keeping us waiting. More people now arrived one after the other. The marchioness proceeded to make tea and distributed it, a.s.sisted by her sister, much in the same way as did the d.u.c.h.ess of Fairfield and her daughters. I was naturally introduced to many of the visitors, Princess A., Countess B., Baron C., Monsieur D., etc., but for me, a foreigner, it is impossible to remember their names.

The d.u.c.h.ess of Fairfield and the Lady Dulciana were among the new arrivals.

--'Baron and I had a very heated discussion the other day,' remarked the marchioness. Then turning to me, she said, 'Did we not?' To which I replied, 'If you please, it was indeed interesting.'

--'Did you go to the Trocadero the other evening?' said the marchioness.

--'Yes! we did. Thank you very much for sending the box. And the d.u.c.h.ess and her party were there too,--in a box close by ours,' I added.

--'Did the lecture interest you?' asked the marchioness.

--'Oh yes! the experiments were all very interesting, but I hardly understood a single sentence of the lecture,' I answered.

--'No wonder! for no one else understood it, at least, I did not. It was so scientific,' interposed Baron C.

'Ah! you were there too, of course,' said I. 'And the best fun of the evening was that there was a man distributing hand-bills. At first we all thought it was a kind of syllabus of the lecture, but in reality it was the advertis.e.m.e.nt of a compet.i.tor stating that he was an earlier inventor.'

The marchioness and her sister, being the hostesses, were unable to talk long to each guest. I soon found myself sitting next to the d.u.c.h.ess on a sofa, with Baron C. in front of us on a chair. Our conversation having turned upon the question of the separation of state and religion, Baron C., who was keen on the subject, being a Deputy, said:

--'With us it is a very interesting question. There are many points to be thought of and discussed, but I think it interests outsiders very little, especially a person like yourself, a j.a.panese, for I understand the j.a.panese gentry have very little religion.'

--'And yet,' said the d.u.c.h.ess, 'in my opinion there is scarcely a single people who have no religion at all. Bus.h.i.+do is the creed of the j.a.panese gentry, as I understand, and in truth it is nothing else than a religion. The Latin _religio_, from which the term religion is derived, comes from the verb _religere_ to hold tight. In that sense, at least, Bus.h.i.+do must also be taken for a religion. I know something about it, especially through your writings. But, baron, will you please explain to me something about the points of resemblance and difference between our ancient chivalry and your Bus.h.i.+do?'

--'I am not, madam, well acquainted with your chivalry, and, therefore, I cannot pretend to hit the mark. But I know that one of the ideals of your chivalry was "bravery" to the point of being fearless of death; in that there is certainly a great resemblance. Another of your ideals was loyalty and truthfulness. Always ready to render a.s.sistance to one weaker; in that also there is a great resemblance. The third ideal was: a great devotion to religion. On this point I must admit there is some difference. I do not say our Bus.h.i.+ despised the idea of supernatural beings, but you see our Bus.h.i.+ had more faith in their own spirit of self-reliance, therefore religion governed their thoughts to no such degree as it did in the West. Then comes a great difference between them,--I mean their att.i.tudes as regards the fair s.e.x. But have you no objection to my proceeding further?'

--'Not at all,' said the d.u.c.h.ess.

--'Very well,' said I. 'With your chivalry the custom of rendering respect to the fair s.e.x had been carried to such a high pitch that it was nothing less than adoration or wors.h.i.+p. I do not say the motive was originally bad, because it came no doubt from the idea of helping the weaker. But, remember, it often happened that too much prominence was given to keeping faithfulness to women, even where one had some higher duty which ought to have claimed the whole loyalty of his heart. The subject is rather too delicate for me to describe minutely, but you can see what I mean. In the days of your chivalry faithfulness in love-affairs was looked upon in general as gallantry, no matter whether the affair was honourable or otherwise, but with the j.a.panese Bus.h.i.+do it was very different. It was not because a Bus.h.i.+ was heartless toward the weaker s.e.x, but effeminacy was a thing which he despised most. In the days gone by in j.a.pan, if a Bus.h.i.+ had been found paying too much attention to a lady, and making himself a slave to her, to the neglect of his duty, he would have been hooted out of society. With European chivalry, therefore, the tendency of desire was to be noticed by others for his actions performed in homage to a lady, whilst with our chivalry one would try to do his utmost to conceal his emotion and even to look cold. In the West, therefore, the word "gallantry," which was originally used more for "das.h.i.+ng and n.o.ble bravery" came in common parlance to have quite a different meaning, as you know. Nothing of the sort has ever taken place with us.'

--'But I thought your Samurai also had love-affairs--I was at least made to understand so from your story of the other day about a young Samurai,' interrupted Lady Dulciana.

--'Yes, that is true, but our Samurai is not "trees and stones" as we say, and you must know there are exceptions to every rule,' I replied and continued.

--'There was also another great difference. In the West chivalry had grown and decayed, traversing always pretty much the same line; I mean it had undergone no great transformation. But in j.a.pan the case was somewhat different. There it became united with the art of intellectual learning, and has made Bus.h.i.+do, that is, the ways of Bus.h.i.+, more systematic and ethical.'

--'What you have just told us,' said Baron C., 'seems to explain some difference which is said to exist in the att.i.tudes of men towards women in your country and ours.'

--'Perhaps so,' I answered, 'where a gentleman approaches a lady and kisses her hand, as one sees commonly in the best Parisian society, a j.a.panese would stand at a distance and make a respectful bow. There is no doubt, it seems to me, that a great many of the customs which prevailed in the feudal period are still influencing your modern society, and ours also in j.a.pan; hence the difference which still exists between the customs of j.a.pan and Western nations. Broadly speaking, I can say that in the West friends.h.i.+p or affection moved more towards intimacy, whilst in the East it moved more towards respect.'

--'Ah, I remember one thing. Some years ago there was a smart American who was a keen observer of different customs and manners. He said, "the j.a.panese hit their wives before strangers, and caress them in private, whilst the Occidentals wors.h.i.+p their wives before strangers, and beat them in private." I beg your pardon, I must not tell you such a thing, I withdraw it at once; but I can say this, it is dangerous to gauge the customs and manners of other countries only by the measure of one's own country. The position of our women is not so low as represented by those who look through the colour of their own gla.s.s.'

--'Very true,' said Baron C. 'Such things often occur. One ought always to be on guard, lest one commit unaccountable errors quite inadvertently. But what do you mean by saying your Bus.h.i.+do has become systematic and ethical. Let us have a little more light on the subject.'

--'Quite so,' said the d.u.c.h.ess. 'I should also like to be more informed on that subject. One never gets tired of things j.a.panese, especially in these days.'

--'I am afraid I shall appear somewhat dogmatic, but if you have enough patience I will explain. In the Far East, Bun and Bu, that is to say matters pertaining to Intellectual culture and matters pertaining to military training, were always regarded, at least in theory, as co-existent and of equal importance. They were compared to the wings of a bird, or to the two wheels of a cart. The generals who were held in the highest esteem were those who were efficient in both. The same esteem was held for all warriors, no matter their degree or rank; though, of course, the higher the rank the greater the excellence expected. They all became imbued with a desire for literary and ethical education, and thus civil elements were introduced into military training. The best ideas and notions of chivalry were ethically systematised, and these ideas and notions came to be nurtured and developed according to the normal roots of ethics. We were fortunate in arriving at this solution, for the country had enjoyed a long peaceful epoch, and the Bus.h.i.+ had therefore sufficient time to give their attention to both subjects. Besides the policy of the country had been directed to that end. Moreover, four hundred thousand families of Bus.h.i.+, having enjoyed their position by hereditary succession, and having no need to labour for existence, all that they had to do was to make themselves as much "a gentleman" as possible. Of course, there were some who became outcasts and some who were newly enrolled, and some who were degraded, and some who were promoted from various causes, but these were exceptions. As a general rule they succeeded to their father's position and handed it down to their own successors. Colleges were established by their lords where they received intellectual education side by side with fencing, riding, the use of spears or the art of jiujitsu.'

--'You mentioned just now,' said the d.u.c.h.ess, 'four hundred thousand families of Bus.h.i.+, and of the heredity of their service. That seems to be somewhat different from our knighthood, which was more of the nature of personal distinction, and its ranks were filled by personal enlistment, although naturally they came from the same cla.s.s of people.'

--'Well,' said I, 'our term Bus.h.i.+, otherwise called Samurai, is a comprehensive one. It comprised all the retainers of the feudal lords.

They generally lived, with their families, in the capital town of the lords under whom they served. There was generally a quarter in these towns where the Samurai lived quite apart from other people. Under some lords, there were Samurai who lived in the country, but they were exceptions. By Bus.h.i.+ then we understand those retainers in general, and as I said the service usually became hereditary. It was the strong point of our military men and also their weakest point, or at least it became so in the course of time.'

--'What do you mean by weak point? Tell me, please,' said Baron C.

--'I say "weak point," because that system as an organisation for fighting purposes became inefficient: the reason is almost plain without saying. You see the hereditary system has one advantage: respect and affection increase from generation to generation. Personal intelligence was also acquired under that system so long as the training and instruction were well attended to, but the descendant of a warrior who had led, for instance, one thousand or one hundred men with great ability, could not always be expected to do as well as his ancestor.

This is so from the very fact that ability and skill for qualifying one for a higher position is not a thing which is hereditary. This is the weakest point of an hereditary military organisation. "Ministers.h.i.+p and generals.h.i.+p are no inherited stocks" is our old saying. Napoleon's eighteen marshals were, one and all, children of the time. Even before the restoration of the present Imperial regime we perceived this weak point, and that was one of the reasons we made a radical change in our military system and adopted the system of universal service. One might think that, by doing so, the spirit of respect and affection, in other words, loyalty and patriotism, might be lessened in the ranks of the troops; but that is not so, for with us the spirit of loyalty to and patriotism for the Emperor and country is very strong among all the people. And because the feudal system had been abolished and the whole nation came to owe no other allegiance than that which is direct to the Emperor, there is no necessity of making any difference among the different cla.s.ses of the people in regard to those services. As to intelligence, we do not leave the children without education, whatever cla.s.s they may belong to, I mean to say, we have adopted a system of universal education which gives sufficient knowledge and therefore intelligence to the men enlisted in the ranks from all cla.s.ses. As to the officers, we take in any candidates who are willing to be suitably educated as such, provided they show sufficient capacity, without any distinction of cla.s.s or family. It seems to us the only way to procure the most efficient officers. We are very radical in these matters. One can see in the j.a.panese army or navy sons of n.o.blemen or rich merchants being commanded and led by an officer who has risen from the lowest cla.s.s of the people. There may even be officers whose origin, if scrutinised minutely, belonged to a cla.s.s vulgarly called "New Commoners."'

--'I think I understand now,' said Baron C. 'But do you mean to say Bus.h.i.+do is a thing of the past? We are made to understand that the whole j.a.panese army and navy, indeed the whole nation, are animated with the spirit of Bus.h.i.+do at this very moment.'

--'No, I did not say Bus.h.i.+do was a thing of the past. Bus.h.i.+ exists no more, it is true, except that those who belonged to that cla.s.s still enjoy the privilege of being called s.h.i.+zoku (knight family), which, however, has no legal signification, and therefore is only an empty t.i.tle. There may be a s.h.i.+zoku driving a carriage or earning a living by selling trifles. It is sad to think of the fact, as far as personal consideration is concerned, but they have given their benefits and privileges for the general good of the country, and I am glad to say that the spirit of Bus.h.i.+do is now made the common property of the whole nation. It has been spread throughout every rank of the j.a.panese.'

--'It seems sad when we think about Bus.h.i.+, as you say, from a personal point of view,' said the d.u.c.h.ess; 'but when a country makes such a great change as your country has done, some great sacrifice on the part of some portion of the community is inevitable.'

--'And especially so with our Bus.h.i.+,' said I, 'because they were in fact the chief instruments by which the present great change has been brought about. When we view things in this way, we can say that our Bus.h.i.+ fought and sacrificed their lives in order to destroy their own order.'

--'But what do you mean by the "New Commoners," which you mentioned just a minute ago?' asked Baron C.

--'By "New Commoners" is meant those who have been newly made ordinary commoners by emanc.i.p.ation. There was in j.a.pan a cla.s.s of people below the cla.s.s of the common subjects of the empire; they neither enjoyed the rights of ordinary j.a.panese nor owed any duty similar to others. I mean to say, they enjoyed no citizens.h.i.+p, but, on the other hand, they had in most cases not to pay taxes for the lands they tilled or dwelt on. Their position may be in one way compared with the slavery which existed in the West from the Roman period onward. But there were two points of a great difference. In the West the slaves had their masters whom they served, and it seems that no personal pollution in our sense was attached to them. In j.a.pan, those people had no masters to serve, and earned their living by their own labour. At the same time, however, they were regarded as having personal pollution, so much so indeed, that they were not allowed, nor did they themselves dare, to enter within the door of an ordinary j.a.panese, still less could they intermarry or indeed hold any social intercourse with them. A love-affair like that of Ada, a slave girl, and Ardames in the opera "Ada," which I had the pleasure of seeing in your company the other evening, is a thing almost unimaginable in j.a.pan between a girl belonging to the cla.s.s I have just spoken of, and a man of any other cla.s.s. The number of these people was only a very small minority of the whole population. But they were to be found in all parts of j.a.pan. In the country they formed here and there small villages. They were also to be found in the vicinity of towns, but always having separate communities. They were the only people who dealt with dead oxen and horses, and even dogs, and also were the only people who dressed the skins of those animals. In former days in j.a.pan no beef was eaten but by those people. Horse flesh was not eaten even by them. The common notion was that horse flesh was sour and inedible, but I am sorry to say that, of late years, it is eaten by the poorer cla.s.ses to some extent. The dealers in it insist on continuing the trade on the ground that the same business is carried on in the midst of the most enlightened nations in the West. I do not like the idea at all. However, to proceed with my story. When a cow, a horse, or a bullock belonging to a commoner died, it was notified to a community of those people, who in a group came and carried the carcase to a convenient place, where they skinned it and buried the rest; and in the case of a cow or a bullock, if it had not died from any infectious disease, they took away its flesh to their homes, as well as the skin and horns. It was the occupation of those communities who lived in the vicinity of a town to prepare the skins sent to them from all parts of the country. Their lot was not, therefore, an enviable one, as you may perceive. This cla.s.s of people was called "Yeta," which is represented, though by corruption, by the Chinese ideographs meaning "much pollution." No one knows exactly what their origin was; some say they were the remnants of Mongolian troops who remained in the land after the total destruction of Mongolian armada, while some say they might have been prisoners from Corea; but all these conjectures are not satisfactory. There was another portion of the people very much akin to those just described. They were known by the name of "Hinin," a term which is represented by two Chinese ideographs, meaning "not-man," which suggests a similarity of notion to the European term "outlaw." This cla.s.s was in number even less than the former. Their occupation was also very different. They chiefly lived by fis.h.i.+ng or by making some trifling articles, and, therefore, no such deep stigma of personal pollution was attached to them as to the other ones. In fact, it was supposed that among this cla.s.s of men there were sometimes to be found a Samurai decla.s.sed from one cause or another. In Yedo, now Tokio, homeless dest.i.tutes were known by that name. One must not suppose, however, that either cla.s.s was unprotected by law, for their lives and properties were respected just as those of ordinary people; and, moreover, they were not necessarily poor people, because some of them, especially those who lived near towns, were very well off.

A characteristic of these people was that they had a certain sentiment of community throughout their own cla.s.s without distinction of locality.

They had no privilege of attending a "s.h.i.+nto" or Buddhist temple belonging to the citizen cla.s.ses, but they had here and there their own Buddhist temple and priests. I have never seen any instance of their possessing any s.h.i.+nto temples; this fact arises from the very nature of s.h.i.+ntoism, which is most sensitive of anything unclean, in other words, most opposed to any pollution. The Imperial regime was inaugurated with most enlightened notions, especially in the matter of personal freedom.

At the very beginning of the Imperial regime, the present Marquis Ito was governor of the prefecture of Hiogo-Kobe, and he emanc.i.p.ated, on his own initiative, the Yeta and Hinin under his government, and made them ordinary commoners. There was little formality in such matters in those days. A governor of a province sometimes took such measures on his own responsibility. In the course of a few years the Imperial Government emanc.i.p.ated all of those people throughout the whole empire, and the people thus emanc.i.p.ated came to be vulgarly called "New Commoners." That term, however, is fast losing its significance, inasmuch as those people are daily acquiring common intercourse with the ordinary people; this is especially the case with those who transfer their abodes to other parts of the country, where their ident.i.ty is not known. I am even told there are one or two deputies in the House of Representatives who originally belonged to that cla.s.s.'

--'It shows a very bold and enlightened policy on the part of your Government,' said the d.u.c.h.ess. 'From all that you have said, it appears that the success of the great changes in your country is due to the combination of democratic ideas with conservative traditions; in other words, you seem to have well succeeded in "putting new wine into old bottles."'

--'If you please, you may think so,' I said; 'that phrase describes our situation very aptly. You see, the present regime of our Imperial Government is, after all, a restoration to its ancient form, animated by modern spirits. Our change has not taken place through any uprising of the people at large. Before the Restoration, European notions of "Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity" had not been much developed, it is true, but then the people had not been labouring under any great oppression and dest.i.tution. They were not rich, as a rule, but they were mostly happy, and not in an extreme condition of misery, as was the case in Europe when the popular movements based on those notions commenced, or as is the case in a certain country now before our eyes. The movements which caused our great change were due almost entirely to aspirations of a political nature, that is to say, for the bettering of the political organism of the country. The matter was taken up by the upper cla.s.ses, and was fought out chiefly by them, and, therefore, when the strife came to an end there existed no more cla.s.s animosity, and the people, both high and low, devoted their energy to the common good which they held in view. It is true that at one time their views of the right methods to attain the end were not altogether unanimous. Some of the feudal lords and their retainers fought against other feudal lords and retainers. One side espoused the Imperial cause, and the other opposed, but those who opposed bore no opposition to the Imperial house itself.

It was more an opposition to the lords and their clansmen who stood on the other side. You know that, after the submission of the Shogun himself to the emperor, the great majority of the feudal lords in the north and the east of j.a.pan effected a combination among themselves and opposed the troops on the Imperial side. What I said just now was chiefly in reference to that occurrence. The nature of our civil war being such, it was not a matter of surprise that the country should be reconciled and conciliated under the new regime. I may here mention an instance, trifling as it is, to show how it has operated even in ordinary social matters. Marshal Oyama, who is now commanding our armies in Manchuria, is a Satsuma man, and he fought as a young officer of the Imperialists in the east. His wife is a daughter of a Samurai of an eastern feudal lord, one of the staunchest opponents to the Imperial troops, I mean the Lord of Aizu, whose castle was besieged and taken after a long resistance. A sister of Madame Oyama is a lady in our Imperial courts, and her brother, who had been a leader of the troops of his clan, was afterwards a general of the Imperial army, and died in that capacity recently. We have a n.o.bility of five grades, almost identical with the European system. The origin of our n.o.ble families is various, but their broad distinctions are: n.o.blemen who were formerly feudal lords; n.o.blemen who were formerly court n.o.bles attached direct to the Imperial courts before the Restoration, and those who have been newly made n.o.bles by virtue of their meritorious services rendered to the new Government. But in the eyes of the law, or rather in the treatment of them by the Imperial court, there is no difference, nor is there any confliction of interest or sentiment existing between them.

Napoleon was a great ruler, there is no doubt, but his one misfortune was that the very nature of his origin was not sufficiently potent to reconcile and harmonise all the difference of this kind in which sentiments go a long way. Supposing he had been a direct scion of the Bourbons, and supposing the general condition of the French people of those days had not been such as it was, and supposing that the great Revolution had been effected by the movements of the aristocracy itself with Napoleon at its head, the course of the history of France might have been very different, although, in spite of that, France has always been a remarkable nation.'

The marchioness seems to have noticed that our conversation was becoming animated and stepped towards us, evidently to take part in it. At this juncture, an elderly gentleman and his wife were ushered into the room.

They were duly introduced to us. He was an astronomer. He said that he and his wife had been in j.a.pan years ago when a transit of Venus across the sun was taking place. But their observation of the transit was a failure owing to bad weather. They stayed eight years, and waited for another transit, but again he was disappointed; because a sudden change in the weather obscured the heavens.

--'That must have been a great disappointment,' I said. 'As to myself, I have seen one such transit very well at a temporary observatory erected at Yokohama. It was very interesting to me, unscientific as I am, to see the sun reflected in white on the prepared ground, and the planet, a small black spot, traversing slowly across the white surface.

Of course, one could also see the actual sun and planet through a smoked gla.s.s. The transit I refer to might have been a different one, or else the locality where I saw it from was not the same. I will tell you a stupid experience of mine,' said I, turning to others present. 'There was a total eclipse of the sun, some eighteen years ago. I was on a trip, and had to cross over a high mountain pa.s.s. I, and a few companions, thought it would be great fun to see an eclipse from the summit of the mountain and observe all the changing phenomena of nature from there. So we hurried on our way, but by the time we reached the summit the sky was very cloudy, it even showered, and the consequence was that we did not see much and regretted that we had not stayed a little longer on the lower grounds, from where the people saw the eclipse very well. Fancy the height of a mountain,--however high it may be, it is only an infinitesimal part of the distance between the earth and the sun. To think that we would be nearer to the sun if we climbed to the summit of the mountain was an act of great stupidity; but such things often occur in actual life. We often forget to think about the relative situation between ourselves and others, and make our calculations according to fancy. Thus great errors are often committed.

Such is the case when we play at games, say at chess. We make our moves, thinking that our opponent would make his move just as we ourselves would do, but the probability is that he makes a move totally different to our antic.i.p.ation, much to our chagrin and surprise. All this arises from our negligence of making a proper estimate of the relative position occupied by both sides.'