Humphrey Duke of Gloucester Part 28

[797] _Rot. Parl._, iv. 390, 391.

[798] _Ibid._, iv. 391.

[799] _Ibid._, iv. 391.

[800] _Ibid._, iv. 392.

[801] See _Ordinances_, iv. 238.

[802] So Stubbs, iii. 115, copied by Ramsay, i. 441.

[803] _Rot. Parl._, iv. 392.

[804] He had been dismissed for 'certain reasons' not specified. See Rymer, IV. iv. 177.

[805] _Rot. Parl._, iv. 392. See also _Miscellaneous Rolls_, Bundle xix. No. 3.

[806] _Rot. Parl._, iv. 396.

[807] _Ordinances_, iv. 136-138.

[808] De Beaucourt, ii. 462.

[809] _Ordinances_, iv. 158.

[810] _Cal. of French Rolls_, Rep. 48, App. 290.

[811] Rymer, IV. iv. 194; Gregory, 176.

[812] Monstrelet, 666.

[813] _Ibid._, 673; _Lond. Chron._, 120; Leland, _Collectanea_, i.

491; Polydore Vergil, 47.

[814] Devon, _Issue Roll_, 425.

[815] Stevenson, _Letters and Papers_, ii. 417, 418. This doc.u.ment, which is undated, is put under the year 1428 by the editor, though no reason is a.s.signed for so doing. The fact that Beaufort is alluded to as a cardinal, and the mention of Bedford, confines the possible date of the manifesto within 1427 and 1435. This was the only occasion between these two dates that Gloucester set foot in Calais, where this doc.u.ment was signed.

[816] Rymer, IV. iv. 194.

[817] _Lond. Chron._, 120.

[818] _Cal. Rot. Pat._, 277; G. E. C., _Peerage_, iv. 44.

[819] _Rot. Parl._, iv. 420.

[820] _Ibid._, iv. 420.

[821] _Ordinances_, iv. 175.

[822] _Rot. Parl._, iv. 420.

[823] _Rot. Parl._, vi. 422.

[824] See the evidence of a contemporary; _Chron. Henry VI._, 14.

[825] _Rot. Parl._, iv. 423.

[826] _Rot. Parl._, iv. 423.

[827] _Ibid._, iv. 424.

[828] _Ordinances_, iv. 186.

[829] _Rot. Parl._, iv. 132-139.

[830] See Stubbs, iii. 117, 118.

[831] _Rot. Parl._, iv. 439.

[832] _Rot. Parl._, iv. 424.

[833] _Register of Abbot Curteys_, part of which is printed in _Archaeologia_ for the year 1806, vol. xv. pp. 66-71.

[834] Probably April 24, the last Sat.u.r.day in the month.

[835] _Ordinances_, iv. 210, 211.

[836] _Ordinances_, iv. 213-215.

[837] _Ordinances_, iv. 211-213.

[838] _Ibid._, iv. 243-247.

[839] His quarrel with Gloucester never seems to have been made up, for in his will, made in 1435, the name of his brother does not once appear, and the chief executors were the Archbishop of York and Beaufort--two of Gloucester's most determined opponents. _Testamenta Vetusta_, i. 242.

[840] English envoys were appointed July 20, 1435; _Cal. of French Rolls_, Rep. 43, App. 306.

[841] Waurin, iv. 69-84.

[842] _Ibid._, iv. 84, 85.

[843] _Chron. Henry VI._, 15.

[844] Waurin, iv. 94, 95.

[845] _Ibid._, iv. 96-101.

[846] _Ibid._, iv. 97, 98.