Matisse Picasso And Gertrude Stein Part 31

The meaning of undertaking was not extravagantly antic.i.p.ated when they were not older than they had been. They were not all disliking something. They attributed the same arrangement to the thing that was happening. They did not deny intending to be meditating. They were not all there then. There were not too many anywhere. They were all when they were there.

Each one of them presuming that that one was that one were not presuming all the time that they were presuming often. Each one of them was the opposite of something. They did not each one determine all of anything.

They did undertake enough.

A part.i.tion separating all in one room from all in another room and which has a door is the wall that is not disturbing the condition of all living in a building. This was not a complication. It did not belong there where it was and that was not neccesary when they were all living.

They did change something.

They did not any of them come there where each one was living. They were not indulging in everything.

A likely way to stay indoors is to have some interruption. They were not dealing in undertaking removing an active cooperation. They had the extreme way of being there where they had joined coming. This was not an alteration. This was division. This was diminis.h.i.+ng alternation. They said all that which was the hearty hearing of anything which was the combination of that thing. They did not destroy themselves then. They were permitting all that they had as being living. They did not inhabit every building. They were all there when they had that inspiration. They did again when all of them were some of them. Some of them were all of them. One of them was one and that was the state of active occupation.

All was not artificial. This was not the meaning of ending and beginning. There could be the one who was the one who could be that one.

They were not repeating signalling to each other that they were joining together. They did not learn to come together. They stayed when they saw that they had a movement. They did not stay then. They did not learn all that there was of leaving. They meant it all.

One who harmonised this did not refuse to utter something. He said that he saw something. He did not agree to everything. He was not refusing to neglect the rest of the things that were meaning what they were meaning.

He did not have enough distraction to occupy all the way that he moved.

He did not move too much all the time. He did what he did. He joined some. He neglected remaining all the time. He directed that best. He was not apportioning all the merit to each one as each one said something.

He gave everything. He used something. He did not come again all the time. He was not withdrawing mentioning what had been mentioned. He introduced some. He said it all. He was giving the same. He came all of some of the ways that were not the only ways. He did not deny the same thing again. He adjusted feeling desertion. He rearranged adding instruction. He deserted equalisation. He regretted acceleration. He denied intention. He agreed to description. He felt combination. He ordered reorganisation. He atoned for beginning. He pursued realisation.

He adored distribution. He remarked domination. He altered acceptation.

He changed selection. He persisted in continuation. He achieved elimination. He rested in conclusion. He grew older.

They were not the same when they saw it all and they did not change.

There were enough of them. One was enough and he did not change. He did it all. He was acc.u.mulating this thing. He was not alone. He did not know any of them then and he met them and he knew them. He went away with one of them. He was enough.

He was not disturbing wearing what he was coming to have as a thing that was to cover him. He did not say that he liked it more than he did. He said he had been feeling something. He did not like to hear that he was the one who was having what he was having. He was not refusing hearing anything.

He had that as past what he was feeling in the future. He did not relieve himself of all of anything. He did not order any one to come and remain. He said that he asked all of the way meaning is being existing.

He was not dividing coming again from remaining. He was the one who had remained and then had not left. He was the one who went where he went and did that which was the thing that was done then. He did not interfere with himself in hearing himself tell it all again. He was not astonis.h.i.+ng.

This was not the only way that he was and he was the one who was all of that one. He did the same when he felt all he felt and he kept all he did when he felt all he felt. He had the same explanation when he was agreeing that he was winning as he had when he was agreeing that he was feeling. He was not sleeping in the morning and he was eating something in the evening. He did not turn away from this thing. He felt all that he felt. He did what he did when he did that which he did to do what he did. He attempted the whole way of going to be remaining and he succeeded in staying and astonis.h.i.+ng. He did not undertake everything.

To sweep and not to leave what is not swept up, to reply and not to refuse to continue talking, to explain and to convince some one, to show all and to keep what is hidden, to be expressive and to attack the expense of travelling, to be careful and to e.j.a.c.u.l.a.t.e, to be sincere and to be using confounding refusing with deterioration, to be moving and steadying and surging and complaining and succeeding and grieving and exalting and speeding and pressing and acquiring is not the same thing as being any one. Some one is not the same and that one is not refusing all in refusing everything. That one is the only one. He is there again.

He sits where he tells what he tells when he tells all he tells as he tells why he tells what there is that he can tell and has told. He does not refuse to remain although he does stay when he stays. He is there.

This is not the end of all that.

a.s.sailable barter in withdrawing slaughter is not the least of expression of following disaster. The ardent sitter and the intending hearer and the reclaiming helper and the disturbing divider and the vigorous hearer and the alarming buyer and the deep thinker and the steady beginner, all the leader and half the seller, all the listener and all the controller, all the etcetera and all the clearer, all the continuer and the rest steadily staying somewhere, all the same what was was there and what is is here. If the rest remain then getting them all there is not laughing as each one can tell the same. They do not all see. They have that which becomes them. They are not keeping everything.

They give it again. They say they do.

He had all when he had enough and knew them all and said it as if he saw where he heard. He was s.h.i.+ning and there was not all the fast bowing that he was not doing. He did the same. He said that and something else.

He was not remaining still. He stated it all. It was there and he was with it when he did not loan it. He did not loan it. This was not all the same.

Way in and way on and the waiting and all and he was there and they were anywhere when there was there and they were not anywhere but there. They did not astonish themselves as they expected to be where there was there. They were feeling all of it and all they said they listened not to answer and hear but to say and see. They were the same. That was individual. They were the group. That was the way. They said it some.

That was the rest. They saw it there. That was the reason. They felt it all. That was the feeling. They did it then. That was their doing. They hung it well. That was their arrangement. They were giving something.

That was their way. They helped it then. That was their expression. They met often. That was their intention. They separated then. That was their separation.

They were not identical with what had happened. They were not opposing what was delighting them. They were not losing what they were saying.

They were not giving what they were urging. They were not the same.

Walking around when the wet place is drying is not causing all the discussion which can be had when one and the other one and one and one have put the four places together so that they all have the same position. They describe each other. They were not darkening sitting and not waiting. They were feeling. They could see the white cover that was taken off when they were together. They felt all of something. They felt all of that thing. They were all coming. They had the picture of their having been those who had done what those had done and they had the decision that they were seeing all that they were seeing. They did not die one by one. They did not die, all of them. They did not see what was the same thing as being coming to remain where they placed what they were when they were to come to be something. They were shortly having all the remains of continuing. They had been feeling. They had all the same what was the rest of something. They had something.

In leaving they were not leaving what was left. They did not undertake it all. They did not refuse this.

They were the same when they told that they were where they were they were the same as feeling is inducing blasting. They were not the same when they were all seeing the same expression. They were the same when they were all giving all they were saying. They were the same when they were helping all invitation to be existing. They were not the same when they were not extinguis.h.i.+ng something. They were all the same when all of them remembered that they had yet all of the rest to see. They were not the same when they were not wis.h.i.+ng what they were exchanging. They were not all the same.

He was not all the same. He did not choose to go away and leave the refusal of adding one to one. He did not enjoy everything.

He who was not the same was the one who talking was not adjusting all he was saying to all he was doing. He did that. He wore the same color when he was happier and when he was duller. He wore a color and he was showing color. That was not in him a disembarkation. He had some of the convenience. He came to have some conveniences. He was used to them.

Some talking is all the rest when all the rest is where there is more of that. He who was not alternating was the one who was the same and being the same he used all of that. He did it with the way that he wore that color more and more. He was not all the rest. There were the rest. He was not any of them. They were there. He was there. They were not anywhere. He was not anywhere.

Ninety-five and seventy-two are not all the numbers that he said he knew when he said he would make an arrangement that would satisfy him. He did not hope for more than he came to have. He allowed that he was despairing. He said he was feeling all that. He said he was all the same.

He said that when he heard that the only number was fifty-two he was willing to keep it and he said that when he did not keep it he was suffering. He said he did suffer. He said that when he had sixty-five he was certain that he had been right. He was right and he had enough and he kept on saying so. He said it was hard work. He said he did not suffer but he said he did not like somethings. He said he felt that. He said he was not obliging and he was not needing to be enterprising. He said that he came where he came and he said that that was not all the meaning there was when he saw all. He said he did do that. He did.

That was not the only answer there was. There was an answer that he kept all the rest. There was an answer that he meant something. That was an answer that he could not distinguish what was sung. There was an answer that he kept on. There was an answer. He did not have all the names. He knew them all. He did not stay at home. He did not like everything. He was succeeding.

All the way he had to say that he did see the use of some who did the same when they came to have enough to show it all. He did not sigh when he said that he would see in the direction in which there came all the strength that he felt there could be as each one did that which he did in showing all there is to see. He was n.o.ble, he did anitic.i.p.ate the rest. He did release all of going often. He did visit every afternoon.

He did eat all he said he needed. He felt the complete way of feeling what he was deciding and originating. He was not foolish. He was not uninterested. He did not answer everything when he said that he did what he did. All the way that there came all the rest who were strong, all the way that each one had the life he was saying would be expressing all the tendency to simplify what could be elaborate, all the way that there the steady help of employing a correction and a criticism and a piece of paper and more action, all the way each one said that he was talking, all there was there was of living as each one is existing, all the way that there came to be the whole of it all, all the way is not the way they all expected to stay.

They did not smell the same when they came all the way. They did not say that they would not put what they had where they had when they stayed.

They did not say that they had that way. They did say what they did say.

A package that is carried is a package that has in it what is inside it.

This is not the answer when some one asking is asking what it is that is being carried. Any way of alternating visiting is one way of not going the same way as the way some one has gone that way. This is not enough to change everything.

All the conclusions that are beginning are not the difficulties that each one is refusing. They were all indicating something. They had that which they did and they sold it and some bought it. This was not discouraging.

He said it, it was not the only way to say it, it was the only way he said it, he said that the same was all the same, he said he was feeling the absolute transmission of the acc.u.mulation of regarding what he was regarding. He said he did it all. He said he was not certain. He said he must have it, he said that the way to say it again was not the only way, he said he would not do that, he said that he had all the rest, he said that he had no way to come to that conclusion, he said he might wear something to show anything, he said it was difficult, he said what he said, he explained all that he answered, he did not recline, he was not concentrating everlasting interruption, he did the same, he was always there, he did not die, he was not needing everything, he was the one who did that which when it was seen was not what he said he denied. He was yielding. He listened then. He did not change anything. He was necessary. He did not leave it all. He did not give anything. He was there. He did all that. He saw the rest come to be gone. He was not gone. He did not come to stay. He had the same.

One and here and there and somewhere and always separate and frequently not a.s.sembling one and the others who were not the ones denying that, some did reply when they were not denying answering. They said, each one of them, they said it all.

Many many tickle what is not ticklish and many tickle the rest when that is not the only way to say that every bad one and every good one is the kind of a one to go away.

The argument that is the one to use when all argument is being used is the one that that one uses who is that one.

All the way to keep away is the way to select all that is selected when what has been given has been kept.

A dark and light place where the flowers are growing is the place where any one coming and going could admire anything. This was not enough to make all the meaning there is when one is that one and any one is some one. There is an intermediate way of saying good-day. There is not a hot day that is so hot as the day that is hot enough so that the ones that are hot are hot. The darkness that comes when the half hour that is beginning is not finished is not the same darkness as the darkness that does not begin and is not dark. All the list that was written is the list that is not shown. Everything is said and some one can listen.

It was not the best way that way which was the best way, the best way was the way which was that way and that way was only that way as the way which was the way was not darting away. There was a way. The best way was that way the way that was that way which was the best way. All that came and sat and stood said something and this was not a darker way of their being an only way than any other way.

He who was independent and afraid to say that the house was painted was independent and did say the house was painted. The house was painted, who is afraid, that the house is painted is not any more than being there where there is that house and the house is painted. This is not all the way there is a way, there is more way than there has been too much way. This is not the condition of not reminding every one of something.

An arrangement that followed remaining together was not the only arrangement every one made who followed every other one. There was not every misunderstanding. There was no disposition to resist the whole business of remaining being living.

Carting there where there was paper carting cloth there was not an occupation. Kindly asking some one to be leaving was not an occupation.

n.o.body did it.

Hardly had one who was longer than the use of color hardly had he had he remained a long time when he came to do what he did. He used some of that and then it did not happen that he intruded remaining. He was the end of something.