Death By Black Hole Part 16

THEN, IN WHAT amounts to a stunning yet unheralded philosophical inversion, throngs of ecclesiastics and scholars began to declare that it was the laws of physics themselves that served as proof of the wisdom and power of G.o.d. amounts to a stunning yet unheralded philosophical inversion, throngs of ecclesiastics and scholars began to declare that it was the laws of physics themselves that served as proof of the wisdom and power of G.o.d.

One popular theme of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries was the "clockwork universe"-an ordered, rational, predictable mechanism fas.h.i.+oned and run by G.o.d and his physical laws. The early telescopes, which all relied on visible light, did little to undercut that image of an ordered system. The Moon revolved around Earth. Earth and other planets rotated on their axes and revolved around the Sun. The stars shone. The nebulae floated freely in s.p.a.ce.

Not until the nineteenth century was it evident that visible light is just one band of a broad spectrum of electromagnetic radiation-the band that human beings just happen to see. Infrared was discovered in 1800, ultraviolet in 1801, radio waves in 1888, x-rays in 1895, and gamma rays in 1900. Decade by decade in the following century, new kinds of telescopes came into use, fitted with detectors that could "see" these formerly invisible parts of the electromagnetic spectrum. Now astrophysicists began to unmask the true character of the universe.

Turns out that some celestial bodies give off more light in the invisible bands of the spectrum than in the visible. And the invisible light picked up by the new telescopes showed that mayhem abounds in the cosmos: monstrous gamma-ray bursts, deadly pulsars, matter-crus.h.i.+ng gravitational fields, matter-hungry black holes that flay their bloated stellar neighbors, newborn stars igniting within pockets of collapsing gas. And as our ordinary, optical telescopes got bigger and better, more mayhem emerged: galaxies that collide and cannibalize each other, explosions of superma.s.sive stars, chaotic stellar and planetary orbits. And as noted earlier our own cosmic neighborhood-the inner solar system-turned out to be a shooting gallery, full of rogue asteroids and comets that collide with planets from time to time. Occasionally they've even wiped out stupendous ma.s.ses of Earth's flora and fauna. The evidence all points to the fact that we occupy not a well-mannered clockwork universe, but a destructive, violent, and hostile zoo.

Of course, Earth can be bad for your health too. On land, grizzly bears want to maul you; in the oceans, sharks want to eat you. Snowdrifts can freeze you, deserts dehydrate you, earthquakes bury you, volcanoes incinerate you. Viruses can infect you, parasites suck your vital fluids, cancers take over your body, congenital diseases force an early death. And even if you have the good luck to be healthy, a swarm of locusts could devour your crops, a tsunami could wash away your family, or a hurricane could blow apart your town.

SO THE UNIVERSE wants to kill us all. But, as we have before, let's ignore that complication for the moment. wants to kill us all. But, as we have before, let's ignore that complication for the moment.

Many, perhaps countless, questions hover at the front lines of science. In some cases, answers have eluded the best minds of our species for decades or even centuries. And in contemporary America, the notion that a higher intelligence is the single answer to all enigmas has been enjoying a resurgence. This present-day version of G.o.d of the gaps goes by a fresh name: "intelligent design." The term suggests that some ent.i.ty, endowed with a mental capacity far greater than the human mind can muster, created or enabled all the things in the physical world that we cannot explain through scientific methods.

An interesting hypothesis.

But why confine ourselves to things too wondrous or intricate for us to understand, whose existence and attributes we then credit to a superintelligence? Instead, why not tally all those things whose design is so clunky, goofy, impractical, or unworkable that they reflect the absence of intelligence?

Take the human form. We eat, drink, and breathe through the same hole in the head, and so, despite Henry J. Heimlich's eponymous maneuver, choking is the fourth leading cause of "unintentional injury death" in the United States. How about drowning, the fifth leading cause? Water covers almost three-quarters of Earth's surface, yet we are land creatures-submerge your head for just a few minutes and you die.

Or take our collection of useless body parts. What good is the pinky toenail? How about the appendix, which stops functioning after childhood and thereafter serves only as the source of appendicitis? Useful parts, too, can be problematic. I happen to like my knees, but n.o.body ever accused them of being well protected from b.u.mps and bangs. These days, people with problem knees can get them surgically replaced. As for our pain-p.r.o.ne spine, it may be a while before someone finds a way to swap that out.

How about the silent killers? High blood pressure, colon cancer, and diabetes each cause tens of thousands of deaths in the U.S. every year, but it's possible not to know you're afflicted until your coroner tells you so. Wouldn't it be nice if we had built-in biogauges to warn us of such dangers well in advance? Even cheap cars, after all, have engine gauges.

And what comedian configured the region between our legs-an entertainment complex built around a sewage system?

The eye is often held up as a marvel of biological engineering. To the astrophysicist, though, it's only a so-so detector. A better one would be much more sensitive to dark things in the sky and to all the invisible parts of the spectrum. How much more breathtaking sunsets would be if we could see ultraviolet and infrared. How useful it would be if, at a glance, we could see every source of microwaves in the environment, or know which radio station transmitters were active. How helpful it would be if we could spot police radar detectors at night.

Think how easy it would be to navigate an unfamiliar city if we, like birds, could always tell which way was north because of the magnet.i.te in our heads. Think how much better off we'd be if we had gills as well as lungs, how much more productive if we had six arms instead of two. And if we had eight, we could safely drive a car while simultaneously talking on a cell phone, changing the radio station, applying makeup, sipping a drink, and scratching our left ear.

Stupid design could fuel a movement unto itself. It may not be nature's default, but it's ubiquitous. Yet people seem to enjoy thinking that our bodies, our minds, and even our universe represent pinnacles of form and reason. Maybe it's a good antidepressant to think so. But it's not science-not now, not in the past, not ever.

ANOTHER PRACTICE THAT isn't science is isn't science is embracing embracing ignorance. Yet it's fundamental to the philosophy of intelligent design: I don't know what this is. I don't know how it works. It's too complicated for me to figure out. It's too complicated for any human being to figure out. So it must be the product of a higher intelligence. ignorance. Yet it's fundamental to the philosophy of intelligent design: I don't know what this is. I don't know how it works. It's too complicated for me to figure out. It's too complicated for any human being to figure out. So it must be the product of a higher intelligence.

What do you do with that line of reasoning? Do you just cede the solving of problems to someone smarter than you, someone who's not even human? Do you tell students to pursue only questions with easy answers?

There may be a limit to what the human mind can figure out about our universe. But how presumptuous it would be for me to claim that if I can't solve a problem, neither can any other person who has ever lived or who will ever be born. Suppose Galileo and Laplace had felt that way? Better yet, what if Newton had not not? He might then have solved Laplace's problem a century earlier, making it possible for Laplace to cross the next frontier of ignorance.

Science is a philosophy of discovery. Intelligent design is a philosophy of ignorance. You cannot build a program of discovery on the a.s.sumption that n.o.body is smart enough to figure out the answer to a problem. Once upon a time, people identified the G.o.d Neptune as the source of storms at sea. Today we call these storms hurricanes. We know when and where they start. We know what drives them. We know what mitigates their destructive power. And anyone who has studied global warming can tell you what makes them worse. The only people who still call hurricanes "acts of G.o.d" are the people who write insurance forms.

TO DENY OR ERASE the rich, colorful history of scientists and other thinkers who have invoked divinity in their work would be intellectually dishonest. Surely there's an appropriate place for intelligent design to live in the academic landscape. How about the history of religion? How about philosophy or psychology? The one place it doesn't belong is the science cla.s.sroom. the rich, colorful history of scientists and other thinkers who have invoked divinity in their work would be intellectually dishonest. Surely there's an appropriate place for intelligent design to live in the academic landscape. How about the history of religion? How about philosophy or psychology? The one place it doesn't belong is the science cla.s.sroom.

If you're not swayed by academic arguments, consider the financial consequences. Allow intelligent design into science textbooks, lecture halls, and laboratories, and the cost to the frontier of scientific discovery-the frontier that drives the economies of the future-would be incalculable. I don't want students who could make the next major breakthrough in renewable energy sources or s.p.a.ce travel to have been taught that anything they don't understand, and that n.o.body yet understands, is divinely constructed and therefore beyond their intellectual capacity. The day that happens, Americans will just sit in awe of what we don't understand, while we watch the rest of the world boldly go where no mortal has gone before.

REFERENCES.

Modern publications of historic texts are listed when available.

Aristotle. 1943. On Man in the Universe On Man in the Universe. New York: Walter J. Black.

Aronson, A., and T. Ludlam, eds. 2005. Hunting the Quark Gluon Plasma: Results from the First 3 Years at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) Hunting the Quark Gluon Plasma: Results from the First 3 Years at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC). Upton, NY: Brookhaven National Laboratory. Formal Report: BNL-73847.

Atkinson, R. 1931. Atomic Synthesis and Stellar Energy. Astrophysical Journal Astrophysical Journal 73: 25095. 73: 25095.

Aveni, Anthony. 1989. Empires of Time Empires of Time. New York: Basic Books.

Baldry, K., and K. Glazebrook. 2002. The 2dF Galaxy Reds.h.i.+ft Survey: Constraints on Cosmic Star-Formation History from the Cosmic Spectrum. Astrophysical Journal Astrophysical Journal 569: 582. 569: 582.

Barrow, John D. 1988. The World within the World The World within the World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

[Biblical pa.s.sages] The Holy Bible The Holy Bible. 1611. King James Translation.

Brewster, David. 1860. Memoirs of the Life, Writings, and Discoveries of Sir Isaac Newton Memoirs of the Life, Writings, and Discoveries of Sir Isaac Newton, vol. 2. Edinburgh: Edmonston.

[Bruno, Giordano] Dorothea Waley Singer. 1950. Giordano Bruno Giordano Bruno (containing (containing On the Infinite Universe and Worlds [1584]). On the Infinite Universe and Worlds [1584]). New York: Henry Schuman. New York: Henry Schuman.

Burbidge, E. M.; Geoffrey. R. Burbidge, William Fowler, and Fred Hoyle. 1957. The Synthesis of the Elements in Stars. Reviews of Modern Physics Reviews of Modern Physics 29:15. 29:15.

Carlyle, Thomas. 2004. History of Frederick the Great History of Frederick the Great [1858]. Kila, MT: Kessinger Publis.h.i.+ng. [1858]. Kila, MT: Kessinger Publis.h.i.+ng.

[Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams] Brian Marsden, ed. 1998. Cambridge, MA: Center for Astrophysics, March 11, 1998.

Chaucer, Geoffrey. 1964. Prologue. The Canterbury Tales The Canterbury Tales [1387]. New York: Modern Library. [1387]. New York: Modern Library.

Clarke, Arthur C. 1961. A Fall of Moondust A Fall of Moondust. New York: Harcourt.

Clerke, Agnes M. 1890. The System of the Stars The System of the Stars. London: Longmans, Green, & Co.

Comte, Auguste. 1842. Coups de la Philosophie Positive Coups de la Philosophie Positive, vol. 2. Paris: Bailliere.

---. 1853. The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Compte The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Compte, London: J. Chapman.

Copernicus, Nicolaus. 1617. De Revolutionibus...o...b..um Coelestium (Latin) De Revolutionibus...o...b..um Coelestium (Latin), 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Wilhelmus Iansonius.

---. 1999. On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Sphere (English). On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Sphere (English). Norwalk, CT: Easton Press. Norwalk, CT: Easton Press.

Darwin, Charles. 1959. Letter to J. D. Hooker, February 8, 1874. In The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin. New York: Basic Books.

---. 2004. The Origin of Species The Origin of Species. Edison, NJ: Castle Books.

DeMorgan, A. 1872. Budget of Paradoxes Budget of Paradoxes. London: Longmans Green & Co.

de Vaucouleurs, Gerard. 1983. Personal communication.

Doppler, Christian. 1843. On the Coloured Light of the Double Stars and Certain Other Stars of the Heavens. Paper delivered to the Royal Bohemian Society, May 25, 1842. Abhandlungen der Koniglich Bohmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften Abhandlungen der Koniglich Bohmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Prague, 2: 465.

Eddington, Sir Arthur Stanley. 1920. Nature Nature 106:14. 106:14.

---. 1926. The Internal Const.i.tution of the Stars The Internal Const.i.tution of the Stars. Oxford, UK: Oxford Press.

Einstein, Albert. 1952. The Principle of Relativity The Principle of Relativity [1923]. New York: Dover Publications. [1923]. New York: Dover Publications.

---. 1954. Letter to David Bohm. February 10. Einstein Archive 8-041.

[Einstein, Albert] James Gleick. 1999. Einstein, Time Time, December 31.

[Einstein, Albert] Phillipp Frank. 2002. Einstein, His Life and Times Einstein, His Life and Times [1947]. Trans. George Rosen. New York: Da Capo Press. [1947]. Trans. George Rosen. New York: Da Capo Press.

Faraday, Michael. 1855. Experimental Researches in Electricity Experimental Researches in Electricity. London: Taylor.

Ferguson, James. 1757. Astronomy Explained on Sir Isaac Newton's Principles Astronomy Explained on Sir Isaac Newton's Principles, 2nd ed. London: Globe.

Feynman, Richard. 1968. What Is Science. The Physics Teacher The Physics Teacher 7, no. 6: 31320. 7, no. 6: 31320.

---. 1994. The Character of Physical Law The Character of Physical Law. New York: The Modern Library.

Forbes, George. 1909. History of Astronom History of Astronomy. London: Watts & Co.

Fraunhofer, Joseph von. 1898. Prismatic and Diffraction Spectra Prismatic and Diffraction Spectra. Trans. J. S. Ames. New York: Harper & Brothers.

[Frost, Robert] Edward Connery Lathem, ed. 1969. The Poetry of Robert Frost: The Collected Poems, Complete and Unabridged The Poetry of Robert Frost: The Collected Poems, Complete and Unabridged. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

Galen. 1916. On the Natural Faculties On the Natural Faculties [c. 180]. Trans. J. Brock. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [c. 180]. Trans. J. Brock. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[Galileo, Galilei] Stillman Drake. 1957. Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.

Galileo, Galilei. 1744. Opera Opera. Padova: Nella Stamperia.

---. 1954. Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences. New York: Dover Publications.

---. 1989. Sidereus Nucius Sidereus Nucius [1610]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1610]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gehrels, Tom, ed. 1994. Hazards Due to Comets and Asteroids Hazards Due to Comets and Asteroids. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

Gillet, J. A., and W. J. Rolfe. 1882. The Heavens Above The Heavens Above. New York: Potter Ainsworth & Co.

Gregory, Richard. 1923. The Vault of Heaven The Vault of Heaven. London: Methuen & Co.

[Harrison, John] Dava Sobel. 2005. Longitude Longitude. New York: Walker & Co.

Ha.s.san, Z., and Lui, eds. 1984. Ideas and Realities: Selected Essays of Abdus Salaam Ideas and Realities: Selected Essays of Abdus Salaam. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.

Heron of Alexandria. Pneumatica Pneumatica [c. 60]. [c. 60].

Hertz, Heinrich. 1900. Electric Waves Electric Waves. London: Macmillan and Co.

Hubble Heritage Team. Hubble Heritage Images Hubble Heritage Images. http://heritage.stsci.edu.

Hubble, Edwin P. 1936. Realm of the Nebulae Realm of the Nebulae. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

---. 1954. The Nature of Science The Nature of Science. San Marino, CA: Huntington Library.

Huygens, Christiaan. 1659. Systema Saturnium (Latin) Systema Saturnium (Latin). Hagae-Comitis: Adriani Vlacq.

---. 1698. [Cosmotheoros,] The Celestial Worlds Discover'd (English The Celestial Worlds Discover'd (English). London: Timothy Childe.

Impey, Chris, and William K. Hartmann. 2000. The Universe Revealed The Universe Revealed. New York: Brooks Cole.

Johnson, David. 1991. V-1, V-2: Hitler's Vengeance on London V-1, V-2: Hitler's Vengeance on London. London: Scarborough House.

Kant, Immanuel. 1969. Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens [1755]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. [1755]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

Kapteyn, J. C. 1909. On the Absorption of Light in s.p.a.ce. Contrib. from the Mt. Wilson Solar Observatory, Contrib. from the Mt. Wilson Solar Observatory, no. 42, no. 42, Astrophysical Journal Astrophysical Journal (offprint), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (offprint), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kelvin, Lord. 1901, Nineteenth Century Clouds over the Dynamical Theory of Heat and Light. In London Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science London Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 2, 6th Series, p. 1. Newcastle, UK: Literary and Philosophical Society. 2, 6th Series, p. 1. Newcastle, UK: Literary and Philosophical Society.

---. 1904. Baltimore Lectures Baltimore Lectures. Cambridge, UK: C. J. Clay and Sons.

Kepler, Johannes. 1992. Astronomia Nova Astronomia Nova [1609]. Trans. W. H. Donahue. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [1609]. Trans. W. H. Donahue. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

---. 1997. The Harmonies of the World The Harmonies of the World [1619]. Trans. Juliet Field. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society. [1619]. Trans. Juliet Field. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.

Lang, K. R., and O. Gingerich, eds. 1979. A Source Book in Astronomy & Astrophysics A Source Book in Astronomy & Astrophysics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Laplace, Pierre-Simon. 1995. Philosophical Essays on Probability Philosophical Essays on Probability [1814]. New York: Springer Verlag. [1814]. New York: Springer Verlag.

Larson, Edward J., and Larry Witham. 1998. Leading Scientists Still Reject G.o.d. Nature Nature 394: 313. 394: 313.

Lewis, John L. 1997. Physics & Chemistry of the Solar System Physics & Chemistry of the Solar System. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.

Loomis, Elias. 1860. An Introduction to Practical Astronomy An Introduction to Practical Astronomy. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Lowell, Percival. 1895. Mars Mars. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.